Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not a fan of the new Eldritch Knight
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 9872163" data-attributes="member: 23751"><p>Your interpretation doesn't align with the wording of the rules at all.</p><p></p><p>"Willing. If your urging aligns with the monster's desires, <strong>no ability check is necessary</strong>; the monster fulfills your request in a way it prefers."</p><p></p><p>Do you see how with a willing creature no ability check is necessary? Here's Charmed.</p><p></p><p>"While you have the Charmed condition, you experience the following effects.</p><p>Can't Harm the Charmer. You can't attack the charmer or target the charmer with damaging abilities or magical effects.</p><p>Social Advantage. <strong>The charmer has Advantage on any ability check to interact with you socially</strong>."</p><p></p><p>Do you see how Charmed grants advantage on ability checks made socially? </p><p></p><p>Those are mutually exclusive positions. You cannot have Charmed make someone willing and therefore not have any ability check in social situations like your suggestion idea to fail saves, and also cause social ability checks to be made with advantage. That's hard proof that the Charmed condition does not make creatures willing.</p><p></p><p>The only one bending over backwards here to make their interpretation happen is you. There's nothing written that allows what you say, and there are written rules that directly oppose what you say.</p><p></p><p>The Suggestion spell can only force a course of action against the will of creature. It then applies the Charmed condition, which as I just proved, does not force willingness. Your proposal upthread fails on its face.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 9872163, member: 23751"] Your interpretation doesn't align with the wording of the rules at all. "Willing. If your urging aligns with the monster's desires, [B]no ability check is necessary[/B]; the monster fulfills your request in a way it prefers." Do you see how with a willing creature no ability check is necessary? Here's Charmed. "While you have the Charmed condition, you experience the following effects. Can't Harm the Charmer. You can't attack the charmer or target the charmer with damaging abilities or magical effects. Social Advantage. [B]The charmer has Advantage on any ability check to interact with you socially[/B]." Do you see how Charmed grants advantage on ability checks made socially? Those are mutually exclusive positions. You cannot have Charmed make someone willing and therefore not have any ability check in social situations like your suggestion idea to fail saves, and also cause social ability checks to be made with advantage. That's hard proof that the Charmed condition does not make creatures willing. The only one bending over backwards here to make their interpretation happen is you. There's nothing written that allows what you say, and there are written rules that directly oppose what you say. The Suggestion spell can only force a course of action against the will of creature. It then applies the Charmed condition, which as I just proved, does not force willingness. Your proposal upthread fails on its face. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not a fan of the new Eldritch Knight
Top