Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not enjoying the urban adventure I'm running
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pming" data-source="post: 7968980" data-attributes="member: 45197"><p>Hiya!</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Whell THAR'S yer problim! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>I'll make it short: Don't "plan"..."prepare". HUGE difference.</p><p></p><p><strong>Plan</strong>: "NPC ABC knows about NPC XYZ, and NPC LMN is in cahoots with XYZ. When the PC's confront ABC, LMN will not be mentioned".</p><p><strong>Prepare</strong>: "The 'Cabal' is focusing on keeping the PC's in the dark about LMN".</p><p></p><p> The difference is that in the "planned" version, you are assuming that the PC's <em>will not</em> know about the ABC/LMN connection. If one of the PC's uses a spell to get more info, or an astute Player puts two and two together...well...everything you 'planned' for that session relying on the PC's ignorance is FUBAR. But...if you go the 'prepare' route, you may have certain ideas/things going on in the background that you can use and modify that would 'make sense' if the PC's go and confront ABC.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again... the difference between "planning" and "preparing". If you are planning...then yeah, the law/guards getting involved is likely not 'planned for' in regards to encounters and whatnot. If you 'wing it' for one encounter, that will mess up something in the next...which will quickly snowball to the point where the 5th to 14th encounters make zero sense (if they are even possible). But if you had just 'prepared' then you know the make up of the guards, the make up of the thieves guild, the amount of training/skill each 'side' has, where their headquarters is, who is likely to support each side if a 'street war' breaks out, have maps of barracks, warehouses, hovels, market places, and so on, as well as a few pages with typical NPC's stats (commoners, 'tough guy', children, dogs, etc), etc.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is exactly the thing you should be doing! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /> I bet you didn't "plan" for the villain to get away and plot a revenge, did you? That would be part of "preparing". Ask yourself "Ok, what IF he has a change to escape? What would he likely do, based on his personality, goals, alignment, etc?"...then, no matter what the PC's actually do, you are "prepared" for it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As I said...don't PLAN....in stead PREPARE.</p><p>The easiest way to do this is, IME, to <em>not design encounters based on the PC's make-up</em> (re: their individual classes, races, what spells they have, magic items, etc). All you need is amount of PC's and their average level. After that, who cares. It's not your place to pre-determine how an encounter is going to go or if it is even going to happen. That's ENTIRELY on your Players. For example...when they went to the constabulary. Did you 'plan' for the possibility of the PC's trying to force/blackmail/threaten the captain of the watch? I'm betting no, you didn't. If you HAD...would you have made him a 'tough fight' to a group of 3rd level PC's? BAD DM! NO! NO! <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /> You look at the size of the city, the danger level, and how 'tough and experienced' a guard would have to be to become Captain of such a city. Lets say that works out in your mind to be "8th level". Well, if you were <em>preparing</em>, you'd have that info. If the PC's attack...well...not your problem. The PC's all die or get arrested. Is this a problem? Yes...IF you were <em>planning</em> stuff....and an absolute No if you were <em>prepared</em>. Would such a turn of events ruin the adventure? Again, Yes...if you wrote it with a "planning for the PC's capabilities/actions"...and, again, an absolute No if you wrote it with a "preparing for the PC's to be in the city".</p><p></p><p>Bottom line: It's not up to you to make sure the PC's win (or even CAN win). It's up to you to portray a living, breathing, believable and consistent fantasy campaign world...where NPC's and groups all have their own goals in 'life'. They are not there to be "reasonable challenges for the PC's to mow down".</p><p></p><p>Then again, I guess I qualify as a "killer DM" by today's standards... so there is that. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>^_^</p><p></p><p>Paul L. Ming</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pming, post: 7968980, member: 45197"] Hiya! Whell THAR'S yer problim! ;) I'll make it short: Don't "plan"..."prepare". HUGE difference. [B]Plan[/B]: "NPC ABC knows about NPC XYZ, and NPC LMN is in cahoots with XYZ. When the PC's confront ABC, LMN will not be mentioned". [B]Prepare[/B]: "The 'Cabal' is focusing on keeping the PC's in the dark about LMN". The difference is that in the "planned" version, you are assuming that the PC's [I]will not[/I] know about the ABC/LMN connection. If one of the PC's uses a spell to get more info, or an astute Player puts two and two together...well...everything you 'planned' for that session relying on the PC's ignorance is FUBAR. But...if you go the 'prepare' route, you may have certain ideas/things going on in the background that you can use and modify that would 'make sense' if the PC's go and confront ABC. Again... the difference between "planning" and "preparing". If you are planning...then yeah, the law/guards getting involved is likely not 'planned for' in regards to encounters and whatnot. If you 'wing it' for one encounter, that will mess up something in the next...which will quickly snowball to the point where the 5th to 14th encounters make zero sense (if they are even possible). But if you had just 'prepared' then you know the make up of the guards, the make up of the thieves guild, the amount of training/skill each 'side' has, where their headquarters is, who is likely to support each side if a 'street war' breaks out, have maps of barracks, warehouses, hovels, market places, and so on, as well as a few pages with typical NPC's stats (commoners, 'tough guy', children, dogs, etc), etc. This is exactly the thing you should be doing! :) I bet you didn't "plan" for the villain to get away and plot a revenge, did you? That would be part of "preparing". Ask yourself "Ok, what IF he has a change to escape? What would he likely do, based on his personality, goals, alignment, etc?"...then, no matter what the PC's actually do, you are "prepared" for it. As I said...don't PLAN....in stead PREPARE. The easiest way to do this is, IME, to [I]not design encounters based on the PC's make-up[/I] (re: their individual classes, races, what spells they have, magic items, etc). All you need is amount of PC's and their average level. After that, who cares. It's not your place to pre-determine how an encounter is going to go or if it is even going to happen. That's ENTIRELY on your Players. For example...when they went to the constabulary. Did you 'plan' for the possibility of the PC's trying to force/blackmail/threaten the captain of the watch? I'm betting no, you didn't. If you HAD...would you have made him a 'tough fight' to a group of 3rd level PC's? BAD DM! NO! NO! ;) You look at the size of the city, the danger level, and how 'tough and experienced' a guard would have to be to become Captain of such a city. Lets say that works out in your mind to be "8th level". Well, if you were [I]preparing[/I], you'd have that info. If the PC's attack...well...not your problem. The PC's all die or get arrested. Is this a problem? Yes...IF you were [I]planning[/I] stuff....and an absolute No if you were [I]prepared[/I]. Would such a turn of events ruin the adventure? Again, Yes...if you wrote it with a "planning for the PC's capabilities/actions"...and, again, an absolute No if you wrote it with a "preparing for the PC's to be in the city". Bottom line: It's not up to you to make sure the PC's win (or even CAN win). It's up to you to portray a living, breathing, believable and consistent fantasy campaign world...where NPC's and groups all have their own goals in 'life'. They are not there to be "reasonable challenges for the PC's to mow down". Then again, I guess I qualify as a "killer DM" by today's standards... so there is that. ;) ^_^ Paul L. Ming [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not enjoying the urban adventure I'm running
Top