Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not enough DMs / new edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 9356493" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>Call me a cynic, but I honestly do not believe it is the ease or difficulty of DMing that makes someone choose to do it. People DM mainly for other reasons-- they like creating stories and outlines and plots, their personality is such that being the one "in charge" comes naturally to them, they want to play bad enough that they will run a game just so there is a game to be played, they are a multitasker at heart and enjoy the challenge of juggling many balls at once (or as [USER=86653]@overgeeked[/USER] mentioned they have ADHD and are just wired to perform better doing many tasks rather than just one), or they have played enough that they've developed a very specific or idiosyncratic preference towards gaming and running games is the only way to assure themselves they can get the type of game they want.</p><p></p><p>It doesn't matter how easy you make it... most people just don't want the responsibility of running the game. In fact, I would go so far as to say that the type of person who would want to DM would strive to do so <em>regardless</em> of how easy or hard it was. If the act of DMing was that enticing to someone, they're the kind of person who will do all the required legwork and reading necessary to learn how to do it. After all... who are the people who usually are the ones we hear about who don't learn the rules? The players. The DMs almost always do learn the rules, because acquiring that knowledge is part and parcel with wanting to acquire the ability to DM. Few are the DMs who don't learn how the game works and are still able to maintain a table of players (at least a table of players who do care how the game works.)</p><p></p><p>So while making the rules and instruction clear on how running the game works and starting simple and moving towards more complexity is never a bad thing... I also don't think we or WotC needs to go over the top with it. Because quite frankly I am adamant in the belief that the more you try to parcel out the rules just like they were board game instructions, the further you get away from what roleplaying games are. Some of you might not like "Rulings, Not Rules"... but Rulings are exactly the thing that makes a roleplaying game DIFFERENT that a board game. Because you CAN'T have a rule for everything in an RPG because no game can guess the infinite number of things that the players will think to do. The game can give suggestions on how to adjudicate actions, and indeed that's part of the necessary instruction the rules should pass on to people... but thankfully the type of person who would be predisposed to dungeonmaster is probably the type of person who would be okay with doing so.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 9356493, member: 7006"] Call me a cynic, but I honestly do not believe it is the ease or difficulty of DMing that makes someone choose to do it. People DM mainly for other reasons-- they like creating stories and outlines and plots, their personality is such that being the one "in charge" comes naturally to them, they want to play bad enough that they will run a game just so there is a game to be played, they are a multitasker at heart and enjoy the challenge of juggling many balls at once (or as [USER=86653]@overgeeked[/USER] mentioned they have ADHD and are just wired to perform better doing many tasks rather than just one), or they have played enough that they've developed a very specific or idiosyncratic preference towards gaming and running games is the only way to assure themselves they can get the type of game they want. It doesn't matter how easy you make it... most people just don't want the responsibility of running the game. In fact, I would go so far as to say that the type of person who would want to DM would strive to do so [I]regardless[/I] of how easy or hard it was. If the act of DMing was that enticing to someone, they're the kind of person who will do all the required legwork and reading necessary to learn how to do it. After all... who are the people who usually are the ones we hear about who don't learn the rules? The players. The DMs almost always do learn the rules, because acquiring that knowledge is part and parcel with wanting to acquire the ability to DM. Few are the DMs who don't learn how the game works and are still able to maintain a table of players (at least a table of players who do care how the game works.) So while making the rules and instruction clear on how running the game works and starting simple and moving towards more complexity is never a bad thing... I also don't think we or WotC needs to go over the top with it. Because quite frankly I am adamant in the belief that the more you try to parcel out the rules just like they were board game instructions, the further you get away from what roleplaying games are. Some of you might not like "Rulings, Not Rules"... but Rulings are exactly the thing that makes a roleplaying game DIFFERENT that a board game. Because you CAN'T have a rule for everything in an RPG because no game can guess the infinite number of things that the players will think to do. The game can give suggestions on how to adjudicate actions, and indeed that's part of the necessary instruction the rules should pass on to people... but thankfully the type of person who would be predisposed to dungeonmaster is probably the type of person who would be okay with doing so. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not enough DMs / new edition
Top