Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not liking Bounded Accuracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 6773845" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>You don't have to change the system. You just have to be creative with how you use the system. I've been having fun with the 5E skill system using it to highlight characters and add cinematic flair to otherwise boring skill challenges. My players don't mind it at all because the number one rule is make it fun. Everyone rolling a die for everything isn't fun. It's tedious and ruins verisimilitude, especially on ridiculous rolls like the wizard with the 8 strength rolling a natural 20 to knock a door down while the half-orc with the 20 strength fails. Not cinematic or interesting at all. That is what you get when you run things where the DC rolls have an objective meaning.</p><p></p><p>I'd rather have it so that being a big, strong guy has an objective meaning as in there are things he can do that no one else can even attempt. Why should a scrawny gnome wizard with an 8 strength even get to roll to burst an iron bound door? He wouldn't be able to do it at all compared to the huge 6'6" and 300 lb. half-orc. What about a skill or a physical feature like size having an objective meaning? A flat roll alone does not mean something has an objective meaning. In fact, it makes it seem like skills mean nothing or physical size means nothing because anyone with a lucky roll and a couple of attribute points can do the same thing as a person that has physical attributes or areas of knowledge the other person does not even possess.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celtavian, post: 6773845, member: 5834"] You don't have to change the system. You just have to be creative with how you use the system. I've been having fun with the 5E skill system using it to highlight characters and add cinematic flair to otherwise boring skill challenges. My players don't mind it at all because the number one rule is make it fun. Everyone rolling a die for everything isn't fun. It's tedious and ruins verisimilitude, especially on ridiculous rolls like the wizard with the 8 strength rolling a natural 20 to knock a door down while the half-orc with the 20 strength fails. Not cinematic or interesting at all. That is what you get when you run things where the DC rolls have an objective meaning. I'd rather have it so that being a big, strong guy has an objective meaning as in there are things he can do that no one else can even attempt. Why should a scrawny gnome wizard with an 8 strength even get to roll to burst an iron bound door? He wouldn't be able to do it at all compared to the huge 6'6" and 300 lb. half-orc. What about a skill or a physical feature like size having an objective meaning? A flat roll alone does not mean something has an objective meaning. In fact, it makes it seem like skills mean nothing or physical size means nothing because anyone with a lucky roll and a couple of attribute points can do the same thing as a person that has physical attributes or areas of knowledge the other person does not even possess. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not liking Bounded Accuracy
Top