Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not liking Bounded Accuracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 6775832" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>See [MENTION=5834]Celtavian[/MENTION]'s responses which is more what I was responding to. He's arguing that the rules DO say what you're saying they do.</p><p></p><p>Now, you could start changing rules to say that training makes you climb faster. The "attempt and succeed" simply talks about having a higher bonus - that could be through training, or natural talent or a combination of both. But, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about a situation where two characters achieve the exact same success - ie. roll the same result on a check.</p><p></p><p>So, ok, let's unpack your example a bit though. It's a DC 15 wall to climb. We both score a 16, so, we both succeed. You have a +6 bonus to climb through talent and training and I have no bonus at all, simply rolled high. Fair enough, we both do climb the wall. You're saying, I think, that you should climb that wall faster than me. How much faster? Do you gain bonuses to movement? The rules say that climbing is half speed. If we're both human, we climb 15 feet per round, by RAW. Are you saying you should have a climb speed of 45? (That's using the 3x damage model you used earlier with weapons) because you are trained in climbing? Should you move your full speed? But that is a different DC, and a much harder one, that your 16 would not have achieved.</p><p></p><p>So, just how much faster are you climbing? Is it enough to actually make a difference? If I climb at 15 feet and you climb at 19, it's not going to make any difference on a 15 foot wall. Or, at least, not any difference mechanically. And, you can't climb faster than half your speed without raising the DC. So, how exactly do you express, "A trained PC climbs faster than an untrained one"? Oh, and does level matter here? I can be trained at level 1 and have a +2 bonus or I can be trained at level 20 and have a +6. Does my 20th level PC climb three times faster?</p><p></p><p>On and on and on. It's inconsistent. That's why I'm arguing against changing the rules. The system is not finely grained enough to express small increments of change - and if the changes are larger, then the DC changes.</p><p></p><p>I'm just not seeing how you would implement this in any meaningful way without adding all sorts of problems.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 6775832, member: 22779"] See [MENTION=5834]Celtavian[/MENTION]'s responses which is more what I was responding to. He's arguing that the rules DO say what you're saying they do. Now, you could start changing rules to say that training makes you climb faster. The "attempt and succeed" simply talks about having a higher bonus - that could be through training, or natural talent or a combination of both. But, that's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about a situation where two characters achieve the exact same success - ie. roll the same result on a check. So, ok, let's unpack your example a bit though. It's a DC 15 wall to climb. We both score a 16, so, we both succeed. You have a +6 bonus to climb through talent and training and I have no bonus at all, simply rolled high. Fair enough, we both do climb the wall. You're saying, I think, that you should climb that wall faster than me. How much faster? Do you gain bonuses to movement? The rules say that climbing is half speed. If we're both human, we climb 15 feet per round, by RAW. Are you saying you should have a climb speed of 45? (That's using the 3x damage model you used earlier with weapons) because you are trained in climbing? Should you move your full speed? But that is a different DC, and a much harder one, that your 16 would not have achieved. So, just how much faster are you climbing? Is it enough to actually make a difference? If I climb at 15 feet and you climb at 19, it's not going to make any difference on a 15 foot wall. Or, at least, not any difference mechanically. And, you can't climb faster than half your speed without raising the DC. So, how exactly do you express, "A trained PC climbs faster than an untrained one"? Oh, and does level matter here? I can be trained at level 1 and have a +2 bonus or I can be trained at level 20 and have a +6. Does my 20th level PC climb three times faster? On and on and on. It's inconsistent. That's why I'm arguing against changing the rules. The system is not finely grained enough to express small increments of change - and if the changes are larger, then the DC changes. I'm just not seeing how you would implement this in any meaningful way without adding all sorts of problems. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not liking Bounded Accuracy
Top