Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not liking Bounded Accuracy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bmcdaniel" data-source="post: 6780250" data-attributes="member: 1772"><p>I can't believe that this thread is still going on. Isn't it obvious that the DM can determine different results based on the individual characteristics of the PCs? Consider two examples:</p><p></p><p>1. The PCs are trying to remember the name and other facts about a drow queen 500 years ago who founded an enormous temple to Lolth in an underdark city. PC A is a human wizard that is proficient in History, but has lived his entire life on the surface and (ala Greyhawk) had never heard of drow before this adventure. PC B is a drow cleric that is proficient in Religion, but not History, and was actually alive and living in the city at the time the temple was founded! The adventure calls for an Intelligence (History) check. PC B actually rolls higher than PC A, but because PC A has a higher Intelligence and is proficient in History, PC A's adjusted result is higher than PC B's adjusted result. What reasonable DM is going to say that PC A knows more about the drow queen than PC B? </p><p></p><p>2. The PCs are trying to rapidly wade a swift mountain stream that is four feet deep without being swept away. The DM decides to call for a Strength(Athletics) roll. PC A is a halfling is small for his race, merely 2 feet, 8 inches tall and weighing only 35 pounds. PC B is a larger-than-average dragonborn, at 8 feet tall and 350 pounds. PC C is average size, but is an sea elf who specializes in water element spells. Is the DM really going to say that for purposes of determining success, the only relevant factors are the PC's strength and proficiency bonus?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Personally, I would not express the differences among the PCs in the above scenarios as different DCs; instead I would express the difference as differential bonuses to the PCs (that dragonborn gets a +2 bonus on the check, while the halfling has a -8 penalty). To me, the DC is the "objective" part of the success/failure criteria, and the "subjective" part is each PCs individual bonus. But if another DM would prefer to describe the halfling as needing a DC 20 check to succeed, and the dragonborn as merely a DC 10 check, I'm perfectly happy to go along.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bmcdaniel, post: 6780250, member: 1772"] I can't believe that this thread is still going on. Isn't it obvious that the DM can determine different results based on the individual characteristics of the PCs? Consider two examples: 1. The PCs are trying to remember the name and other facts about a drow queen 500 years ago who founded an enormous temple to Lolth in an underdark city. PC A is a human wizard that is proficient in History, but has lived his entire life on the surface and (ala Greyhawk) had never heard of drow before this adventure. PC B is a drow cleric that is proficient in Religion, but not History, and was actually alive and living in the city at the time the temple was founded! The adventure calls for an Intelligence (History) check. PC B actually rolls higher than PC A, but because PC A has a higher Intelligence and is proficient in History, PC A's adjusted result is higher than PC B's adjusted result. What reasonable DM is going to say that PC A knows more about the drow queen than PC B? 2. The PCs are trying to rapidly wade a swift mountain stream that is four feet deep without being swept away. The DM decides to call for a Strength(Athletics) roll. PC A is a halfling is small for his race, merely 2 feet, 8 inches tall and weighing only 35 pounds. PC B is a larger-than-average dragonborn, at 8 feet tall and 350 pounds. PC C is average size, but is an sea elf who specializes in water element spells. Is the DM really going to say that for purposes of determining success, the only relevant factors are the PC's strength and proficiency bonus? Personally, I would not express the differences among the PCs in the above scenarios as different DCs; instead I would express the difference as differential bonuses to the PCs (that dragonborn gets a +2 bonus on the check, while the halfling has a -8 penalty). To me, the DC is the "objective" part of the success/failure criteria, and the "subjective" part is each PCs individual bonus. But if another DM would prefer to describe the halfling as needing a DC 20 check to succeed, and the dragonborn as merely a DC 10 check, I'm perfectly happy to go along. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Not liking Bounded Accuracy
Top