Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 9426793" data-attributes="member: 7023840">Not a half truth, I misunderstood you. I thought you were talking about the ownership of the rights to the art; that was something that Gygax and the Blumes changed (along with royalties, etc.) in the '70s. But again, AFAIK the company under their leadership kept the original artwork.shrugNo idea. But first, we don't know when the policy was changed to allow them to keep the original (and it would be weird to attribute against Lorraine since she was at TSR in 1984 and running day-to-day soon thereafter). Second, at least they were given something for it when the policy reverted (unlike the past policy).Again, this is just bizarre that this is evidence against Lorraine. IMO.But that's what I mean. It appears that people, despite the accumulation of historical evidence, will just categorize everything as "Lorraine bad." You are welcome to do that. I am not comfortable doing that any longer, for the reasons I have already outlined with far too many words.</blockquote>