Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="ezo" data-source="post: 9556281" data-attributes="member: 7037866">Why would I want to do that? Mine is simpler and better, frankly, IMNSHO. Especially since if my Rangers want to use concentration for the spell, they can cast hunter's mark on a favored enemy or whoever for the damage buff.I don't think a roughly 60/40 split is enough deviation to justify anything, especially concerning the larger hobby base outside of this forum.I mean, this wasn't revoluntionary or anything, right? Tasha's came out, a lot of people liked it, some didn't. Pretty much things since then have moved in that direction--we all saw that coming... So, how shocking is it that those concepts or changes implemented in Tasha's and forward made it into the 2024 edition? Not surprising at all IMO.For the roughly 40% who currently are sticking with post-Tasha's 2014, the reasons people have mentioned suffice. Waiting for the final core book or further supplements, don't have the cash for something that is basically the same I already have, etc.Many of that 40% IMO will move on eventually like you said, but some will remain just where they are and be happy about it. I don't think it will only be a &quot;go back&quot; or &quot;move on&quot; split for that 40%. Another reason is they have Tasha's and beyond already, and will explore other systems, returning to the 5.1 point when they return to D&amp;D. For some, they just don't have a compelling reason to move on, and for many we definitely have a compelling reason for going back. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="ezo, post: 9556281, member: 7037866"] Why would I want to do that? Mine is simpler and better, frankly, IMNSHO. Especially since if my Rangers want to use concentration for the spell, they can cast [I]hunter's mark[/I] on a favored enemy or whoever for the damage buff. I don't think a roughly 60/40 split is enough deviation to justify anything, especially concerning the larger hobby base outside of this forum. I mean, this wasn't revoluntionary or anything, right? Tasha's came out, a lot of people liked it, some didn't. Pretty much things since then have moved in that direction--we all saw that coming... So, how shocking is it that those concepts or changes implemented in Tasha's and forward made it into the 2024 edition? Not surprising at all IMO. For the roughly 40% who currently are sticking with post-Tasha's 2014, the reasons people have mentioned suffice. Waiting for the final core book or further supplements, don't have the cash for something that is basically the same I already have, etc. Many of that 40% IMO will move on [I]eventually[/I] like you said, but some will remain just where they are and be happy about it. I don't think it will only be a "go back" or "move on" split for that 40%. Another reason is they have Tasha's and beyond already, and will explore other systems, returning to the 5.1 point when they return to D&D. For some, they just don't have a compelling reason to move on, and for many we definitely have a compelling reason for going back. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification