Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Nothics should speak Common and other languages
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Whizbang Dustyboots" data-source="post: 9791896" data-attributes="member: 11760"><p><em>Disclaimer: Yes, obviously, as a DM, anyone can do this. This is about what should be in the Monster Manual.</em></p><p></p><p>So, <a href="https://www.dndbeyond.com/monsters/5195146-nothic" target="_blank">nothic lore</a> (which I feel like wasn't their original lore in the 3E Miniatures Handbook -- a surprisingly great book, even for theater of the mind groups) is that they're former scholars of forbidden lore, twisted into hideous shapes now dominated by a single unblinking eye that are still consumed with the hunt for forbidden lore.</p><p></p><p>So far, so good, although I think the <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZwdouaZuHU" target="_blank">old Hobbit cartoon</a> tells us that creepy guys with big eyes that slowly blink are probably creepier than those with eyes that don't blink.</p><p></p><p>But nothics only speak Undercommon RAW. I get that they are supposed to have forgotten their old lives -- which is boring, IMO, but OK -- but how much forbidden lore is written in Undercommon? Are they all getting transformed in a drow or mind flayer library?</p><p></p><p>And given that WotC loves sticking nothics into starter sets -- there's one in Lost Mine of Phandalin and another in Heroes of the Borderlands -- and that players are explicitly supposed to negotiate with them, not letting them do so in Common feels like a huge oversight. Some DMs will just miss that they don't speak Common, but others will either stop the negotiations dead or force their PCs to pantomime a conversation.</p><p></p><p>This feels like a missed opportunity. If WotC wants to elevate nothics to be their next "sticky" monster -- monsters that the players fall in love with and want to see return in future; this was an explicit goal with many of the monsters in the 3E Fiend Folio, for instance -- I think the monsters need to be tweaked to be creatures the PCs can do more than fight with.</p><p></p><p>The easiest fix is to just give them the ability to speak Common, but if they're supposed to be creepy scholars of the forbidden, I'd probably toss in 1d4 rare languages as well, to reflect what kind of esoteric studies they're into. (And it'd be kind of fun when the players learn that the forbidden knowledge that turned a former human scholar into a weird monster was written in ... Celestial.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Whizbang Dustyboots, post: 9791896, member: 11760"] [I]Disclaimer: Yes, obviously, as a DM, anyone can do this. This is about what should be in the Monster Manual.[/I] So, [URL='https://www.dndbeyond.com/monsters/5195146-nothic']nothic lore[/URL] (which I feel like wasn't their original lore in the 3E Miniatures Handbook -- a surprisingly great book, even for theater of the mind groups) is that they're former scholars of forbidden lore, twisted into hideous shapes now dominated by a single unblinking eye that are still consumed with the hunt for forbidden lore. So far, so good, although I think the [URL='https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZwdouaZuHU']old Hobbit cartoon[/URL] tells us that creepy guys with big eyes that slowly blink are probably creepier than those with eyes that don't blink. But nothics only speak Undercommon RAW. I get that they are supposed to have forgotten their old lives -- which is boring, IMO, but OK -- but how much forbidden lore is written in Undercommon? Are they all getting transformed in a drow or mind flayer library? And given that WotC loves sticking nothics into starter sets -- there's one in Lost Mine of Phandalin and another in Heroes of the Borderlands -- and that players are explicitly supposed to negotiate with them, not letting them do so in Common feels like a huge oversight. Some DMs will just miss that they don't speak Common, but others will either stop the negotiations dead or force their PCs to pantomime a conversation. This feels like a missed opportunity. If WotC wants to elevate nothics to be their next "sticky" monster -- monsters that the players fall in love with and want to see return in future; this was an explicit goal with many of the monsters in the 3E Fiend Folio, for instance -- I think the monsters need to be tweaked to be creatures the PCs can do more than fight with. The easiest fix is to just give them the ability to speak Common, but if they're supposed to be creepy scholars of the forbidden, I'd probably toss in 1d4 rare languages as well, to reflect what kind of esoteric studies they're into. (And it'd be kind of fun when the players learn that the forbidden knowledge that turned a former human scholar into a weird monster was written in ... Celestial.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Nothics should speak Common and other languages
Top