Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Now Is This A Promise?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 4473348" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>Oh, no. I assume that it is negligence.</p><p></p><p>And, perhaps, you might consider that constantly denying that such negligence is ongoing (lots of stuff re: 4e launch has been ill-considered, and even WotC seems to now think so, judging by their new take on GSL [still in the box, I note], and Gleemax), you yourself are contributing to an overall ill-will. </p><p></p><p>Whether you think it fair or not, it is a hell of a lot harder to let go of ill-will when you are told that the things you are upset about, in effect, "aren't real" than when they are acknowledged. People also get fed up with the amount of ill-considered, marginally justified blinders-wearing that goes on.</p><p></p><p>If you really want the ill-will to die down, the best response is acknowledgement, followed either by discussion as to how the problems can/should be addressed, or acknowledgement, followed by the acknowledgement that, even though those problems may exist, they don't particularly bother you.</p><p></p><p>IMHO and IME, of course.</p><p></p><p>Yelling "There's a pink elephant in the room!' when there is not is no more inciting, or nonsensical, than yelling "No there isn't!" when there is. Having seen all sorts of posts defending whatever WotC does, whenever it does it, it seems reasonable (to me) to ask, as the OP does, just when, exactly, is it okay to say "enough is enough"? When do we stop saying "Well, they didn't promise X, so it doesn't matter that they did not-X" and voice legitimate concerns over getting not-X instead of X.</p><p></p><p>That's a fair question. In my book at least. Perhaps not in yours.</p><p></p><p>Finally, while I certainly agree that "legalistic logic does not equate to reasonabilty, or ethics", that statement doesn't really have anything to do with negligence not being co-equal to evil (which actually is a statement to do with ethics, if not with reasonability).</p><p></p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 4473348, member: 18280"] Oh, no. I assume that it is negligence. And, perhaps, you might consider that constantly denying that such negligence is ongoing (lots of stuff re: 4e launch has been ill-considered, and even WotC seems to now think so, judging by their new take on GSL [still in the box, I note], and Gleemax), you yourself are contributing to an overall ill-will. Whether you think it fair or not, it is a hell of a lot harder to let go of ill-will when you are told that the things you are upset about, in effect, "aren't real" than when they are acknowledged. People also get fed up with the amount of ill-considered, marginally justified blinders-wearing that goes on. If you really want the ill-will to die down, the best response is acknowledgement, followed either by discussion as to how the problems can/should be addressed, or acknowledgement, followed by the acknowledgement that, even though those problems may exist, they don't particularly bother you. IMHO and IME, of course. Yelling "There's a pink elephant in the room!' when there is not is no more inciting, or nonsensical, than yelling "No there isn't!" when there is. Having seen all sorts of posts defending whatever WotC does, whenever it does it, it seems reasonable (to me) to ask, as the OP does, just when, exactly, is it okay to say "enough is enough"? When do we stop saying "Well, they didn't promise X, so it doesn't matter that they did not-X" and voice legitimate concerns over getting not-X instead of X. That's a fair question. In my book at least. Perhaps not in yours. Finally, while I certainly agree that "legalistic logic does not equate to reasonabilty, or ethics", that statement doesn't really have anything to do with negligence not being co-equal to evil (which actually is a statement to do with ethics, if not with reasonability). RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Now Is This A Promise?
Top