Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jer" data-source="post: 8565144" data-attributes="member: 19857">Thanks for the write-up Snarf.Wouldn't the time to be concerned be when they filed the case?  Not knowing how the law works, is it possible that this is the first time that their lawyer has heard of the fact that Wizards had been continuously publishing books with the marks involved on DriveThru for years before LaNasa filed the trademark claim on them? It really does seem like that aspect of the whole thing makes it all a slam dunk that LaNasa's claims are smoke and mirrors, but then IANAL.People need to stop just assuming "corporations bad" means they can shut off their brains.  This is a battle between two companies that nuTSR picked on purpose.  Wizards would be perfectly happy to not have to defend their trademarks but nuTSR isn't giving them that option.</blockquote>