Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="payn" data-source="post: 9550399" data-attributes="member: 90374">Im of two minds on this. I am an odd bird in that PF1 remains my favorite fantasy RPG. I love sub-systems and got loads of them in that era. Enough to play it forever. So, I am very used to the special ability, feat, class function, prestige, etc.. So, making up something special and giving it a template or whatever is second nature to me. This fits a consistent rules over rulings mindset.However, I also really like static resolution systems. For example, 5E has bounded accuracy so the DC table is the DC table. In Traveller ('goose 2E which I currently use) the check is 8 on 2D6+attribute+skill mod roll. The ref can make it 6 if its an easy thing, or they can make it 10 if its difficult. The important thing here is that both GM and player understand the base system. Anything you put on top is using that as its base. So, the risks and terms are always understandable. Making rulings over rules consistent in application.</blockquote>