Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="deleuzian_kernel" data-source="post: 9566570" data-attributes="member: 7036985">Dude, I love this. It pains me to see how we disagree so much on technique if this is indeed your play priority, because this is my play priority.I think you don't think that what we do with technique gets us the above. Reliably. Your response to my posts makes me think that you really don't.The question that me and other posters have about your techniques is....who is rendering these moral and ethical judgements. Are we doing it together? Or is it really just the GM who pronounces moral judgement through overt declaration or illusionism?This goes for you too! Like, it seems like we totally agree on play priority. All those up and downs and complexities you are describing, I want and get them too. The problem I have with the above is that you say that the conflict is between the characters, not the participants. The conflict does exist in some level at the participant level because we are advocating for their in-fiction conflicts of interest. If you don't advocate for what the squire wants, who will? Certainly not me, I want the opposite.</blockquote>