Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="smootrk" data-source="post: 2329542" data-attributes="member: 28583">You might simplify the tables into one table with a list of modifiers to the XP.&nbsp; It would be easier to calculate and figure out... rather than having multiple tables that really do the same thing.&nbsp; I think you may get better commentary and idea generation on different types of modifiers that may be used.For instance... just using one table and having a +100, +200, or +300 modifier for danger level of the job.&nbsp; A -100, 0, +100, or +200 modifier based on personality traits of the individual (lazy, normal, efficient, work-a-holic).&nbsp; A set of modifiers for environmental factors (construction jobs in an area during the time of a Castle being constructed, Smithy jobs during wartimes (or peace).&nbsp; I could probably go on ...My basic point is keep it simple.&nbsp; Less is often more when it comes to rules involving tables, charts, graphs.&nbsp; I do like very much the basic idea that you have come up with.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="smootrk, post: 2329542, member: 28583"] You might simplify the tables into one table with a list of modifiers to the XP. It would be easier to calculate and figure out... rather than having multiple tables that really do the same thing. I think you may get better commentary and idea generation on different types of modifiers that may be used. For instance... just using one table and having a +100, +200, or +300 modifier for danger level of the job. A -100, 0, +100, or +200 modifier based on personality traits of the individual (lazy, normal, efficient, work-a-holic). A set of modifiers for environmental factors (construction jobs in an area during the time of a Castle being constructed, Smithy jobs during wartimes (or peace). I could probably go on ... My basic point is keep it simple. Less is often more when it comes to rules involving tables, charts, graphs. I do like very much the basic idea that you have come up with. [/QUOTE]

Verification