Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
NPCs With Class Levels?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Kinak" data-source="post: 6116697" data-attributes="member: 6694112"><p>Nothing stops me from throwing together my own monster stats without going through the whole process. I do it all the time.</p><p></p><p>For example, I'm going to be running encounters next week in Pathfinder that involves three monsters from the Bestiary and one monster with class levels added. I already have all of their stats, literally sitting in front of me, but I'll be restatting all of them to be easier to run and more distinctive.</p><p></p><p>Now, I don't doubt that Paizo can produce cool, interesting monsters. But, because of the way 3.5 monsters work, you end up with this huge mess of stats justifying the stats that you're actually using and then a bunch of other stats based on those justifications so you get... garbage, really, or at least more noise than signal.</p><p></p><p>That's what I don't want to see in 5e. I don't need them to justify the monster's stats to me. I just need the monster's stats.</p><p></p><p>Well, I'm not claiming any moral authority there. I don't mean "shouldn't" as in "you're a bad person if you do this," just "shouldn't" as in "I think that's a bad idea."</p><p></p><p>But I do believe that building enemies using the PC rules reaches the level of being a bad idea above and beyond personal preference. Using other techniques, you can build a more interesting enemy faster that will run more easily in play.</p><p></p><p>You may disagree on whether that's the case. But hopefully we can agree that people "shouldn't" do more work to get worse results.</p><p></p><p>I can't speak specifically towards your Tharizdun fight, but I'm familiar with your slaad lords (which are awesome, by the way). At least with those, I agree going 4e doesn't really change anything, but you're also not building them using classes that I remember.</p><p></p><p>Hand-crafting epic boss fights is the way to go. I won't disagree with that at all. Far from it.</p><p></p><p>But I don't think building the boss with PC classes will make the fight better (even if the boss is nominally a wizard or whatever). In my experience, you get a ton of abilities you don't need and, after all that work, still have to add the features that make the fight epic.</p><p></p><p>Cheers!</p><p>Kinak</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Kinak, post: 6116697, member: 6694112"] Nothing stops me from throwing together my own monster stats without going through the whole process. I do it all the time. For example, I'm going to be running encounters next week in Pathfinder that involves three monsters from the Bestiary and one monster with class levels added. I already have all of their stats, literally sitting in front of me, but I'll be restatting all of them to be easier to run and more distinctive. Now, I don't doubt that Paizo can produce cool, interesting monsters. But, because of the way 3.5 monsters work, you end up with this huge mess of stats justifying the stats that you're actually using and then a bunch of other stats based on those justifications so you get... garbage, really, or at least more noise than signal. That's what I don't want to see in 5e. I don't need them to justify the monster's stats to me. I just need the monster's stats. Well, I'm not claiming any moral authority there. I don't mean "shouldn't" as in "you're a bad person if you do this," just "shouldn't" as in "I think that's a bad idea." But I do believe that building enemies using the PC rules reaches the level of being a bad idea above and beyond personal preference. Using other techniques, you can build a more interesting enemy faster that will run more easily in play. You may disagree on whether that's the case. But hopefully we can agree that people "shouldn't" do more work to get worse results. I can't speak specifically towards your Tharizdun fight, but I'm familiar with your slaad lords (which are awesome, by the way). At least with those, I agree going 4e doesn't really change anything, but you're also not building them using classes that I remember. Hand-crafting epic boss fights is the way to go. I won't disagree with that at all. Far from it. But I don't think building the boss with PC classes will make the fight better (even if the boss is nominally a wizard or whatever). In my experience, you get a ton of abilities you don't need and, after all that work, still have to add the features that make the fight epic. Cheers! Kinak [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
NPCs With Class Levels?
Top