Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
nuTSR and the Defamation Lawsuit: How to Read the Appellate Brief of LaNasa
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 9459359" data-attributes="member: 7023840"><p>Okay, so I did a quick dive into one issue because it was bugging me and I had noted it in the above essay.</p><p></p><p>In the district court's opinion, we see the following:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Opinion pp. 23-25. This was the part I was worried about. This is addressed in the brief (pp. 46-48).</p><p></p><p>So I went ahead and looked at the cases cited. First thing I noticed- Lanasa is almost entirely citing state court cases, and some of them are just trial court opinions. Uh oh.</p><p></p><p>Then I actually went and looked at the major cite from the district court's opinion - <em>Tannerite Sports, LLC v. NBCUniversal News Grp</em>., 864 F.3d 236, 246–47 (2d Cir. 2017). You can look at it as well, here-</p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18098386201453137093&q=864+F.3d+236&hl=en&as_sdt=40006[/URL]</p><p></p><p>So now we get back into that Erie issue- we are applying Federal procedure (pleading standards) to the New York law. Under New York law, falsity is an element that must be plead. </p><p></p><p>And if you file a complaint in federal court, you must plead sufficient facts for each element of the claim (this is valled the Iqbal/Twombly standard). So when you plead a New York defamation claim in federal court, you cannot just say that the statement is false, you ALSO have to provide factual allegations that would allow a reasonable person to think it is false.</p><p></p><p>"Because falsity is an element of New York's defamation tort, and "falsity" refers to material not substantially true, the complaint in this case must plead facts that, if proven, would establish that the defendant's statements were not substantially true." <em>Tanner Sports</em>, 864 F. 3d at 247. </p><p></p><p>Now that I have seen this, I think that Lanasa really didn't understand the problem with the claim. Arguing state court cases is precisely the wrong way to do it. Because the problem is that you have to hit the federal pleading standard, which he didn't. </p><p></p><p>The more I look, the worse it is. IMO.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 9459359, member: 7023840"] Okay, so I did a quick dive into one issue because it was bugging me and I had noted it in the above essay. In the district court's opinion, we see the following: Opinion pp. 23-25. This was the part I was worried about. This is addressed in the brief (pp. 46-48). So I went ahead and looked at the cases cited. First thing I noticed- Lanasa is almost entirely citing state court cases, and some of them are just trial court opinions. Uh oh. Then I actually went and looked at the major cite from the district court's opinion - [I]Tannerite Sports, LLC v. NBCUniversal News Grp[/I]., 864 F.3d 236, 246–47 (2d Cir. 2017). You can look at it as well, here- [URL unfurl="true"]https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18098386201453137093&q=864+F.3d+236&hl=en&as_sdt=40006[/URL] So now we get back into that Erie issue- we are applying Federal procedure (pleading standards) to the New York law. Under New York law, falsity is an element that must be plead. And if you file a complaint in federal court, you must plead sufficient facts for each element of the claim (this is valled the Iqbal/Twombly standard). So when you plead a New York defamation claim in federal court, you cannot just say that the statement is false, you ALSO have to provide factual allegations that would allow a reasonable person to think it is false. "Because falsity is an element of New York's defamation tort, and "falsity" refers to material not substantially true, the complaint in this case must plead facts that, if proven, would establish that the defendant's statements were not substantially true." [I]Tanner Sports[/I], 864 F. 3d at 247. Now that I have seen this, I think that Lanasa really didn't understand the problem with the claim. Arguing state court cases is precisely the wrong way to do it. Because the problem is that you have to hit the federal pleading standard, which he didn't. The more I look, the worse it is. IMO. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
nuTSR and the Defamation Lawsuit: How to Read the Appellate Brief of LaNasa
Top