Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="CyanideSprite" data-source="post: 6772482" data-attributes="member: 6798894">... That was YOUR argument that he could have been the villain. So yeah, sure. Go ahead and call your own argument silly.And no, having a broad spectrum of characters that can be represented by a subclass isn't necessarily a good thing. For fighters, sure, it is because it's a generic class that could mean anything from a regimented soldier to a scrappy pub brawler. You fight, so you're a fighter. For Paladins who by definition have convictions and holy talents, it should have more focus and defined to that of a paladin. And that "Lawful Good Paladin that was in different games" is still in THIS game. It's fine to be all about vengeance, especially as a Paladin. I think the OoV tenet of Restitution is a wonderful concept for a Paladin... By Any Means Necessary is not.And to that end, Inigo Montoya wouldn't be a great OoV, because I doubt Inigo Montoya would, say, torture someone just to be sure they don't know anything about Rugen.</blockquote>