Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Obective look at WotC's history with D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Croesus" data-source="post: 5925815" data-attributes="member: 35019"><p>There's a reason why we talk about risk vs. reward. Doing something has risk. Doing nothing has risk. If a business has a negative event, that doesn't mean management made a mistake.</p><p></p><p>Let's flip this around. Say you were late for work because of a traffic jam. But wait - traffic jams happen, so why don't you leave for work an hour early every day, just in case? That would likely (though not 100%) avoid traffic jams. But then you have to consider the cost. Are you really going to waste an extra hour every day just to avoid a potential traffic jam making you late for work?</p><p></p><p>Quoting from a column published several years ago:</p><p></p><p><em>To manage risk you can Avoid, Insure, or Mitigate (Max supplied the acronym, AIM).</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Avoidance means reducing the likelihood that the risk will become an event. Preventive maintenance is one of the most important ways to avoid risk. Staff training, to increase competence, is another.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Insurance includes all tactics that deflect the consequences of risk to someone else. Insurance is the label because that's the best-known way to deflect the consequences of risk...snip...</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>Mitigation means reducing the impact should the risk turn into actual events. Fault-tolerant system design and business recovery planning are well-known risk mitigation tactics. So are cross-training and succession planning.</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>There is, of course, a fourth risk management tactic. It's probably the most popular of them all. It's called hoping. Synonyms are keeping your fingers crossed and denial. Theoretically, you can also accept the risk -- consciously choose to do nothing. Usually, though, acceptance is just another synonym for hoping.</em></p><p></p><p>To the extent that a negative event is due to tactic four, I agree that you should blame management. But all the other methods of managing risk are appropriate, at one time or another, because they acknowledge the fundamental truth that no one controls everything that happens.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Croesus, post: 5925815, member: 35019"] There's a reason why we talk about risk vs. reward. Doing something has risk. Doing nothing has risk. If a business has a negative event, that doesn't mean management made a mistake. Let's flip this around. Say you were late for work because of a traffic jam. But wait - traffic jams happen, so why don't you leave for work an hour early every day, just in case? That would likely (though not 100%) avoid traffic jams. But then you have to consider the cost. Are you really going to waste an extra hour every day just to avoid a potential traffic jam making you late for work? Quoting from a column published several years ago: [i]To manage risk you can Avoid, Insure, or Mitigate (Max supplied the acronym, AIM). Avoidance means reducing the likelihood that the risk will become an event. Preventive maintenance is one of the most important ways to avoid risk. Staff training, to increase competence, is another. Insurance includes all tactics that deflect the consequences of risk to someone else. Insurance is the label because that's the best-known way to deflect the consequences of risk...snip... Mitigation means reducing the impact should the risk turn into actual events. Fault-tolerant system design and business recovery planning are well-known risk mitigation tactics. So are cross-training and succession planning. There is, of course, a fourth risk management tactic. It's probably the most popular of them all. It's called hoping. Synonyms are keeping your fingers crossed and denial. Theoretically, you can also accept the risk -- consciously choose to do nothing. Usually, though, acceptance is just another synonym for hoping.[/i] To the extent that a negative event is due to tactic four, I agree that you should blame management. But all the other methods of managing risk are appropriate, at one time or another, because they acknowledge the fundamental truth that no one controls everything that happens. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Obective look at WotC's history with D&D
Top