Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Obligation to give new players a "Core" game?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wik" data-source="post: 6686696" data-attributes="member: 40177"><p><strong>TL;DR - Does a GM have an obligation to provide a "generic" campaign setting to first-time players?</strong></p><p></p><p>My girlfriend and I live in a small town about an hour's drive from Victoria BC, which is where we game on our regular monday nights. I've been gaming with this group for years now, and this campaign isn't going to end anytime soon.</p><p></p><p>However, small town life being what it is, we're beginning to find that we want some sort of weekly social activity to keep us involved and less hermit-like. Someone else is running a board game night, so we floated the idea of a weekly D&D game, and there are nearly 20 "Applicants" (ie, people that are interested in at least seeing what the game is like). </p><p></p><p>I've spent a few hours putting together ideas for a campaign. I want it attached to my current world, but in a different region, and so decided to develop the "Caliphate of the Seven Sands", a sort of arabic/carthage combination with a touch of Persia thrown in for good measure. And I made a really cool draft of the setting - genies, elemental-touched genasi nobles, elemental cults, dark and brooding versions of the normally nice campaign gods, rampaging gnoll tribes, and scheming rakshasa.</p><p></p><p>It sounded really cool, until I got to thinking. Of the twenty-ish players that are interested, only about a quarter have ever actually played. When we get a table running, at least half of the players will be complete newbies, or really close. The setting I have dreamed up is pretty high-concept and original, and doesn't really deal with a lot of the "core" conceits of a standard D&D setting. Undead and Goblins are basically non-existant. Dragons are found in only small doses. It's an arabian/african vibe instead of european. And so on. </p><p></p><p>Should I maybe drop this idea and present something more "standard" D&D to these players? Something more Forgotten Realms or Lord of the Rings? After all, if this is their only exposure and they walk away after only a few sessions (something I'm sure will happen with a few), they could have the impression that what D&D is "about" is african/arabic themes, sword-and-sandal type stuff, as opposed to the dungeon crawls we all know and love.</p><p></p><p>How "original" should you be when presenting the game to primarily new players? Will the game suffer if you go "too" original for first timers?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wik, post: 6686696, member: 40177"] [b]TL;DR - Does a GM have an obligation to provide a "generic" campaign setting to first-time players?[/b] My girlfriend and I live in a small town about an hour's drive from Victoria BC, which is where we game on our regular monday nights. I've been gaming with this group for years now, and this campaign isn't going to end anytime soon. However, small town life being what it is, we're beginning to find that we want some sort of weekly social activity to keep us involved and less hermit-like. Someone else is running a board game night, so we floated the idea of a weekly D&D game, and there are nearly 20 "Applicants" (ie, people that are interested in at least seeing what the game is like). I've spent a few hours putting together ideas for a campaign. I want it attached to my current world, but in a different region, and so decided to develop the "Caliphate of the Seven Sands", a sort of arabic/carthage combination with a touch of Persia thrown in for good measure. And I made a really cool draft of the setting - genies, elemental-touched genasi nobles, elemental cults, dark and brooding versions of the normally nice campaign gods, rampaging gnoll tribes, and scheming rakshasa. It sounded really cool, until I got to thinking. Of the twenty-ish players that are interested, only about a quarter have ever actually played. When we get a table running, at least half of the players will be complete newbies, or really close. The setting I have dreamed up is pretty high-concept and original, and doesn't really deal with a lot of the "core" conceits of a standard D&D setting. Undead and Goblins are basically non-existant. Dragons are found in only small doses. It's an arabian/african vibe instead of european. And so on. Should I maybe drop this idea and present something more "standard" D&D to these players? Something more Forgotten Realms or Lord of the Rings? After all, if this is their only exposure and they walk away after only a few sessions (something I'm sure will happen with a few), they could have the impression that what D&D is "about" is african/arabic themes, sword-and-sandal type stuff, as opposed to the dungeon crawls we all know and love. How "original" should you be when presenting the game to primarily new players? Will the game suffer if you go "too" original for first timers? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Obligation to give new players a "Core" game?
Top