Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dwimmerlied" data-source="post: 6250253" data-attributes="member: 6706967">I guess I maybe take it all too seriously, but the silly names and such really kind of hampered my suspension of disbelief. I actually loved parts of Greyhawk, but I had to put it away because I couldn't get past the silly names. And the thing is, I think that because so many people were passionate about the setting, new concepts and history was always being added, but I get the feeling all the contributors after EGG kid of felt the same as I do, and sort of worked around or ignored the goofy stuff, and that's obvious to me reading many years later, and not really knowing it's dev history.But I guess Mr Gygax pretty much felt the same way as you do.On the other hand, of course there should be room for funniness in the rulebooks!And to add to what I would absolutely love to see returned; Beguilers! Possibly my favourite class ever. They filled an interesting niche but, IMO were still broad enough to tailor some. Their absence in PF was the primary reason I held out on touching that game for a very long time.Fochlucan Lyrist!; (or the first edition bard it rode in on!). Very versatile, very fun!I also strongly agree with the suggestions to return morale.</blockquote>