Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Observations and opinions after 8 levels and a dragon fight
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Joe Liker" data-source="post: 6477676" data-attributes="member: 6777505"><p>Actually, no, I never said anything about a case-by-case treatment of blindsight. Other people have, but I have not. I think it works the same for every creature that has it. I think it works as a substitute for sight because that's what the rule says it is. I'm adding no exceptions or stipulations, and I'm not claiming it does anything beyond what it says it does.</p><p></p><p>You, on the other hand, are arguing from the position that your conclusion is true. That's called circular logic, and it proves nothing. For a sound argument, you must start from premises that everyone agrees on (in this case, the words written in the rulebooks) and proceed toward your conclusion.</p><p></p><p>What you are trying to convince me of is that blindsight is the same as x-ray vision. You have given no evidence to support this, but instead you're accepting your own conclusion as a premise, while I'm telling you that your premise itself is flawed. There is nothing in the text that says you can see through solid objects. There are, on the other hand, comparisons to sight and echolocation in the text. I am not the one adding extra traits where they don't exist. I am following what I read in the books.</p><p></p><p>The blindsight entry says nothing about stealth, so there is no reason to believe it has any special interactions with stealth beyond the logical extension that invisibility and darkness (both of which affect vision) will not help you hide from someone with blindsight. It can also negate effects like displacement, blur, gaze attacks, and obviously blindness. But it's not x-ray vision. The ability to see through solid objects is a pretty big deal, so it stands to reason that they would explicitly mention that if it were the case.</p><p></p><p>There's a big thread about this on the Wizards community forums where pretty much everyone agrees that this is how blindsight works, not to mention that this is how blindsight has worked in every previous edition that has it (as well as Pathfinder), so I wouldn't go placing any bets if I were you.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Joe Liker, post: 6477676, member: 6777505"] Actually, no, I never said anything about a case-by-case treatment of blindsight. Other people have, but I have not. I think it works the same for every creature that has it. I think it works as a substitute for sight because that's what the rule says it is. I'm adding no exceptions or stipulations, and I'm not claiming it does anything beyond what it says it does. You, on the other hand, are arguing from the position that your conclusion is true. That's called circular logic, and it proves nothing. For a sound argument, you must start from premises that everyone agrees on (in this case, the words written in the rulebooks) and proceed toward your conclusion. What you are trying to convince me of is that blindsight is the same as x-ray vision. You have given no evidence to support this, but instead you're accepting your own conclusion as a premise, while I'm telling you that your premise itself is flawed. There is nothing in the text that says you can see through solid objects. There are, on the other hand, comparisons to sight and echolocation in the text. I am not the one adding extra traits where they don't exist. I am following what I read in the books. The blindsight entry says nothing about stealth, so there is no reason to believe it has any special interactions with stealth beyond the logical extension that invisibility and darkness (both of which affect vision) will not help you hide from someone with blindsight. It can also negate effects like displacement, blur, gaze attacks, and obviously blindness. But it's not x-ray vision. The ability to see through solid objects is a pretty big deal, so it stands to reason that they would explicitly mention that if it were the case. There's a big thread about this on the Wizards community forums where pretty much everyone agrees that this is how blindsight works, not to mention that this is how blindsight has worked in every previous edition that has it (as well as Pathfinder), so I wouldn't go placing any bets if I were you. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Observations and opinions after 8 levels and a dragon fight
Top