Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="the Jester" data-source="post: 6479996" data-attributes="member: 1210">[MENTION=5834]Celtavian[/MENTION], I have to agree with this. The level of disagreement with you in this thread certainly puts the lie to the notion that there is a clear and unambiguous answer that any sensible person can see; and the fact that most of the people in this thread disagree with you makes me doubt very much whether most DMs agree with your interpretation. Continuing to insist that you are right, period end, is just shouting your opinion and hoping to drown out the sea of voices that don't think you are. You've made your argument clear, and many of us have made clear that we disagree with your reasoning. Can't you at least do us the courtesy of accepting that maybe everyone else isn't unambiguously wrong and that your interpretation of how blindsight works is just that- one interpretation?By the way, any argument that requires looking at the rules from a previous edition for support is, IMHO, extremely flawed. How does such an approach help groups that are new to D&D? It doesn't, and it isn't supported anywhere in the 5e rules that I'm aware of.</blockquote>