Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Observations and opinions after 8 levels and a dragon fight
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 6481940" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>No. I have to wait until a game designer either agrees or disagrees with my interpretation.</p><p></p><p>The rule is clear. What isn't clear is the usual group of people that want to add exceptions to a rule without the exceptions existing. This happens on the Internet all the time. </p><p></p><p>If it isn't clear, explain a scenario where you get to make Stealth check against a creature with Blindsight within its range? Are you going to allow general stealth checks? Are you going to allow <em>invisibility</em> to work? Are you going to argue that a moving individual isn't a part of the surroundings? Surroundings is a word that means everything around it. It's not ambiguous.</p><p></p><p>This discussion is the usual thing you get on the Internet. A bunch of people wanting to add things that aren't in a rule because it isn't written out for them in the way they want. </p><p></p><p>All the people that disagree have been stating is "I don't agree". Not what works within range of Blindsight or if a Stealth check is allowed. Or <em>invisibility</em>. Or how any of that works against Blindsight.</p><p></p><p>So why don't some of these people claiming it doesn't detect everything within range, explain exactly what they allow in their games and why. I'll come at it from that angle. Explain why they think <em>invisibility</em> and stealth work.</p><p></p><p>Why does Blindsight a separate entry and a range if it does not detect everything within range? Why not list it as Blindsight and give it no range allowing stealth and the like to work? Why does a dragon with very good senses to begin with need Blindsight if it doesn't detect everything within its range including invisible and stealthing creatures? Might as well leave it with only the usual senses if Blindsight isn't superior. Seriously, why would you give a dragon Blindsight given all its other senses work just fine?</p><p></p><p>Are the people claiming a dragon's blindsight doesn't detect everything allowing Stealth rolls against it based on what...hearing....smell...touch? What Does a dragon's blindsight go off. It already has hearing, touch, and smell.</p><p></p><p>If Blindsight doesn't defeat Stealth and invisibility, what does it do for a creature like a dragon? Nothing since these folks disagreeing with me are basically saying it must make a regular Perception check that it would have had to make with its regular senses.</p><p></p><p>Because there are a number of people disagreeing does not make them anymore correct than at any time in the past such as when the Flat World Theory was the norm. So that part of your argument is weak. I'd rather see you explain why the designers would bother to give blindsight to a creature with all of its regular senses and extraordinary Perception score. What would be the point?</p><p></p><p>While the disagreeable contemplate the above questions around their tables when they come up, I'm going to wait until the Sage provides an answer to continue the debate as I believe that will be the only way to settle this one way or the other.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celtavian, post: 6481940, member: 5834"] No. I have to wait until a game designer either agrees or disagrees with my interpretation. The rule is clear. What isn't clear is the usual group of people that want to add exceptions to a rule without the exceptions existing. This happens on the Internet all the time. If it isn't clear, explain a scenario where you get to make Stealth check against a creature with Blindsight within its range? Are you going to allow general stealth checks? Are you going to allow [I]invisibility[/I] to work? Are you going to argue that a moving individual isn't a part of the surroundings? Surroundings is a word that means everything around it. It's not ambiguous. This discussion is the usual thing you get on the Internet. A bunch of people wanting to add things that aren't in a rule because it isn't written out for them in the way they want. All the people that disagree have been stating is "I don't agree". Not what works within range of Blindsight or if a Stealth check is allowed. Or [I]invisibility[/I]. Or how any of that works against Blindsight. So why don't some of these people claiming it doesn't detect everything within range, explain exactly what they allow in their games and why. I'll come at it from that angle. Explain why they think [I]invisibility[/I] and stealth work. Why does Blindsight a separate entry and a range if it does not detect everything within range? Why not list it as Blindsight and give it no range allowing stealth and the like to work? Why does a dragon with very good senses to begin with need Blindsight if it doesn't detect everything within its range including invisible and stealthing creatures? Might as well leave it with only the usual senses if Blindsight isn't superior. Seriously, why would you give a dragon Blindsight given all its other senses work just fine? Are the people claiming a dragon's blindsight doesn't detect everything allowing Stealth rolls against it based on what...hearing....smell...touch? What Does a dragon's blindsight go off. It already has hearing, touch, and smell. If Blindsight doesn't defeat Stealth and invisibility, what does it do for a creature like a dragon? Nothing since these folks disagreeing with me are basically saying it must make a regular Perception check that it would have had to make with its regular senses. Because there are a number of people disagreeing does not make them anymore correct than at any time in the past such as when the Flat World Theory was the norm. So that part of your argument is weak. I'd rather see you explain why the designers would bother to give blindsight to a creature with all of its regular senses and extraordinary Perception score. What would be the point? While the disagreeable contemplate the above questions around their tables when they come up, I'm going to wait until the Sage provides an answer to continue the debate as I believe that will be the only way to settle this one way or the other. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Observations and opinions after 8 levels and a dragon fight
Top