Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Of all the complaints about 3.x systems... do you people actually allow this stuff ?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pemerton" data-source="post: 5791524" data-attributes="member: 42582"><p>Not that huge, for a couple of reasons.</p><p></p><p>Most important is the change in the healing mechanics. PCs can be expected to be at or very near to full hit points at the start of each combat encounter (because they will have spent healing surges during their short rest), and the constraint on in-combat healing is not healing surges per se, but the capacity to access them (via spells, items, second wind etc). The fighter in my game has 14 healing surges. In a typical combat he will use 3 or 4 of them. From the healing point of view, then, he is no worse off going into a combat with 4 surges remaining than with 14. This is very different from earlier versions of D&D, where the player of the fighter may well be wary of entering combat with only 25% or 30% of hit points remaining - in those circumstances, one or two good hits from the enemies might kill you!</p><p></p><p>A second change is that daily powers are not as superior to encounter or at will powers, as are traditional D&D spells compared to mundane attacks by a wizard (low level clerics are good mundane combatants at low levels, but in classic D&D they also start to weaken a bit at mid-to-high levels). This is in part just a reduction in scaling between at-will, encounter and daily powers, and also because (at least for my group) the daily powers are often somewhat conditional in their utility, and so won't be pulled out for certain sorts of fights (for example, a daily which is strong because it allows three targets to be attacked typically won't be used in a combat with fewer than three dangerous foes).</p><p></p><p>It may be that my group is very idiosyncratic, but these changes have been enough to make the 15-minute day all but go away, whereas in our Rolemaster game - which, like pre-4e D&D, does not have a "reserves" approach to healing, and like pre-4e D&D has daily resources being much stronger than mundane/at-will ones - it was the norm. In Rolemaster, the players would rest once all spell points were spent, and that could easily be after an encounter or two. In 4e they rest once all healing surges are spent, and that genrally takes 4 or more encounters.</p><p></p><p></p><p>As I mentioned earlier, this seems to be somewhat scenario-specific. In particular, it seems to posit the PCs tackling an active opposition, rather than something more passive. It also seems to require a willingness to have the PCs fail off-stage.</p><p></p><p>For those who (i) want the passive "opponent" option (eg ruins exploration), and/or (ii) want the "failures only happen onstage" option, then the 15-minute day <em>is</em> a rules problem, given that - with changes to the rules - those sorts of scenarios and approaches can be made eminently playable.</p><p></p><p></p><p>The ingame time for my group has always tended to be ridiculously short. For example, in the current 15 level campaign about two months of game time has passed - the party has only just finished rescuing some prisoners that they started trying to help at 2nd level, and they still haven't raided the mountain stronghold of the cultists and armies that they have been fighting since 1st level.</p><p></p><p>The actual maths of this works out pretty sensibly for a 4e game - 2 months equals about 60 days, or about 4 days per level, or an average of 2 to 3 encounters per day - many days would have more than that, and others fewer due to travelling, scouting, resting, etc. The frenetic pace has nothing to do with suffering or avoiding 15 minute days, nor with players or PCs being lazy or energetic. It's a consequence of the mechanics.</p><p></p><p>My group actually handles this tendency to freneticness through a type of "cognitive dissonance" between real time and game time: because those 15 levels of play have taken about 3 years, it doesn't <em>feel</em> as frenetic as it in fact is in the fiction.</p><p></p><p>But given that the game is about as frenetic as it could be (and my Rolemaster games were no different) it's not as if I could, or would want to, add in furthert ime pressures to change the incentives for resting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pemerton, post: 5791524, member: 42582"] Not that huge, for a couple of reasons. Most important is the change in the healing mechanics. PCs can be expected to be at or very near to full hit points at the start of each combat encounter (because they will have spent healing surges during their short rest), and the constraint on in-combat healing is not healing surges per se, but the capacity to access them (via spells, items, second wind etc). The fighter in my game has 14 healing surges. In a typical combat he will use 3 or 4 of them. From the healing point of view, then, he is no worse off going into a combat with 4 surges remaining than with 14. This is very different from earlier versions of D&D, where the player of the fighter may well be wary of entering combat with only 25% or 30% of hit points remaining - in those circumstances, one or two good hits from the enemies might kill you! A second change is that daily powers are not as superior to encounter or at will powers, as are traditional D&D spells compared to mundane attacks by a wizard (low level clerics are good mundane combatants at low levels, but in classic D&D they also start to weaken a bit at mid-to-high levels). This is in part just a reduction in scaling between at-will, encounter and daily powers, and also because (at least for my group) the daily powers are often somewhat conditional in their utility, and so won't be pulled out for certain sorts of fights (for example, a daily which is strong because it allows three targets to be attacked typically won't be used in a combat with fewer than three dangerous foes). It may be that my group is very idiosyncratic, but these changes have been enough to make the 15-minute day all but go away, whereas in our Rolemaster game - which, like pre-4e D&D, does not have a "reserves" approach to healing, and like pre-4e D&D has daily resources being much stronger than mundane/at-will ones - it was the norm. In Rolemaster, the players would rest once all spell points were spent, and that could easily be after an encounter or two. In 4e they rest once all healing surges are spent, and that genrally takes 4 or more encounters. As I mentioned earlier, this seems to be somewhat scenario-specific. In particular, it seems to posit the PCs tackling an active opposition, rather than something more passive. It also seems to require a willingness to have the PCs fail off-stage. For those who (i) want the passive "opponent" option (eg ruins exploration), and/or (ii) want the "failures only happen onstage" option, then the 15-minute day [I]is[/I] a rules problem, given that - with changes to the rules - those sorts of scenarios and approaches can be made eminently playable. The ingame time for my group has always tended to be ridiculously short. For example, in the current 15 level campaign about two months of game time has passed - the party has only just finished rescuing some prisoners that they started trying to help at 2nd level, and they still haven't raided the mountain stronghold of the cultists and armies that they have been fighting since 1st level. The actual maths of this works out pretty sensibly for a 4e game - 2 months equals about 60 days, or about 4 days per level, or an average of 2 to 3 encounters per day - many days would have more than that, and others fewer due to travelling, scouting, resting, etc. The frenetic pace has nothing to do with suffering or avoiding 15 minute days, nor with players or PCs being lazy or energetic. It's a consequence of the mechanics. My group actually handles this tendency to freneticness through a type of "cognitive dissonance" between real time and game time: because those 15 levels of play have taken about 3 years, it doesn't [I]feel[/I] as frenetic as it in fact is in the fiction. But given that the game is about as frenetic as it could be (and my Rolemaster games were no different) it's not as if I could, or would want to, add in furthert ime pressures to change the incentives for resting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Of all the complaints about 3.x systems... do you people actually allow this stuff ?
Top