Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 6564513" data-attributes="member: 2011">Not contradictory. I allow as many concentration spells up for casters as they can manage. So allowing 2 is less than not having a limit on number at all. If there is not yet an issue with unlimited number, then there will not be for just 2.So, your house rules on concentration are fine, but mine are not. Got it. <img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing    :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" />All mechanics are there for a reason. Why differentiate between those that you think are ok to modify and those that I think are ok to modify? Very few tables play by any sort of strict RAW anyway.The OP came asking for help. You are saying that he should "not to get swept up by all the “well, at my table…” comments" when those are the types of comments that might help him at his table. Sorry. If someone asks for help, I'll hand out my opinion on what the issue is and maybe how to fix it. You want to stifle suggestions, be my guest. But there are quite a few core rules that could use with some tweaking, especially if one wants to play in certain styles that the core rules seem to try to hinder.</blockquote>