Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="erik_the_guy" data-source="post: 4334574" data-attributes="member: 70483">Ok, to be honest, how many people here agree with this statement:The arguments concerning two weapon fighting and the keywords &quot;wield&quot; and &quot;hold&quot; in this forum are a result of the poor explanations of off-hand weapons and two-weapon fighting in the PHB. The creator did not write this section of the rules very well.Because if that's true then we can argue all day about what the most literal, &quot;correct&quot; application of the rules is, but it probably won't be the same as what was intended. We may as well come up with some agreeable, sensible house rules to cover this until something is released in the future.The arguments in this forum are extremely complex, and I doubt that the creator intended us to figure this out on our own. It is just a poorly written part of the rules. Wait for some errata or ruling ORpost your best suggestions for house rules</blockquote>

[QUOTE="erik_the_guy, post: 4334574, member: 70483"] Ok, to be honest, how many people here agree with this statement: The arguments concerning two weapon fighting and the keywords "wield" and "hold" in this forum are a result of the poor explanations of off-hand weapons and two-weapon fighting in the PHB. The creator did not write this section of the rules very well. Because if that's true then we can argue all day about what the most literal, "correct" application of the rules is, but it probably won't be the same as what was intended. We may as well come up with some agreeable, sensible house rules to cover this until something is released in the future. The arguments in this forum are extremely complex, and I doubt that the creator intended us to figure this out on our own. It is just a poorly written part of the rules. Wait for some errata or ruling OR post your best suggestions for house rules [/QUOTE]

Verification