Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Off Screen NPCs Purely Detrimental?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sol.Dragonheart" data-source="post: 4027323" data-attributes="member: 54316"><p>I've noticed a trend that off screen NPCs are, in one way or another, virtually always detrimental to the party and I was wondering why that is. To elaborate, it seems that every time a PC has a friend, a family member, or develops a connection with an NPC introduced during the campaign arc, they become a liability to the party. At one point or another, it always seems this NPC that is cared for becomes endangered, hurt, or even killed due to the machinations of the PCs foes, and the worst part is, it seems like aside from 24/7 watch by the party themselves, they can never stop it.</p><p></p><p>That brings me to my next point, why is it that NPC allies of the party are virtually always 90-100% ineffective in any actions you task them to? Ask a trusted friend in the guard to watch over a young child you recently placed in an orphanage after rescuing her from an orc camp, and odds are you when you come back to the area, something happened to the child, and your good friend was drunk on duty/busy with other affairs/purely incompetent, and he's shocked that you ever thought he could be relied on in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Even when off screen NPCs are not a pure liability, how often are they actually of real and honest benefit to the party? For once I would like to see a PC with a contact in the Thieves Guild or a father that's a leading nobleman in the city, get the benefits he should logically get from having such connections. </p><p></p><p>It's as if all DMs decide that allowing PCs benefits for having real and honest connections with the NPCs of the world would be giving them something for free, and thereby refuse to ever do it, only using the NPCs to hurt, challenge, or cause some detriment to the PC. I think PCs should be rewarded for allowing and encouraging close connections with the NPCs that exist in the world, aside from their current enemies list.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, it seems few others agree, which is probably why 90-95% of characters created never list good, caring relations with friends or family, only creating a back history for plot hooks and further challenges, or simply going with the orphan/estranged route, since god knows they'll never get anything of actual tangible benefit from their relationships in the world.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sol.Dragonheart, post: 4027323, member: 54316"] I've noticed a trend that off screen NPCs are, in one way or another, virtually always detrimental to the party and I was wondering why that is. To elaborate, it seems that every time a PC has a friend, a family member, or develops a connection with an NPC introduced during the campaign arc, they become a liability to the party. At one point or another, it always seems this NPC that is cared for becomes endangered, hurt, or even killed due to the machinations of the PCs foes, and the worst part is, it seems like aside from 24/7 watch by the party themselves, they can never stop it. That brings me to my next point, why is it that NPC allies of the party are virtually always 90-100% ineffective in any actions you task them to? Ask a trusted friend in the guard to watch over a young child you recently placed in an orphanage after rescuing her from an orc camp, and odds are you when you come back to the area, something happened to the child, and your good friend was drunk on duty/busy with other affairs/purely incompetent, and he's shocked that you ever thought he could be relied on in the first place. Even when off screen NPCs are not a pure liability, how often are they actually of real and honest benefit to the party? For once I would like to see a PC with a contact in the Thieves Guild or a father that's a leading nobleman in the city, get the benefits he should logically get from having such connections. It's as if all DMs decide that allowing PCs benefits for having real and honest connections with the NPCs of the world would be giving them something for free, and thereby refuse to ever do it, only using the NPCs to hurt, challenge, or cause some detriment to the PC. I think PCs should be rewarded for allowing and encouraging close connections with the NPCs that exist in the world, aside from their current enemies list. Unfortunately, it seems few others agree, which is probably why 90-95% of characters created never list good, caring relations with friends or family, only creating a back history for plot hooks and further challenges, or simply going with the orphan/estranged route, since god knows they'll never get anything of actual tangible benefit from their relationships in the world. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Off Screen NPCs Purely Detrimental?
Top