Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zerith" data-source="post: 5452031" data-attributes="member: 99953">I don't think strait, I don't think laterally, I think diagonally, so I fail to see how it is compacted <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f635.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt="O_o" title="Er... what?    O_o"  data-smilie="12"data-shortname="O_o" />;As for the two forms, Fluff? He’s a young Lycanthrope but he is still a full blooded lycanthrope that is a, again young, adult and I think he would be able to assume any given form, maybe not to its full might, but able to amuse it none the less. That said, I would not mind losing the natural attacks till ECL 2 or 3(at ECL3 he should have Alternate From proper) this part is mostly for fluff.And I’d still like that clarification for the answer to my first of five questions[sblock=As below]And about one – Is this referring to feats as per wild shape or as per a Lycanthrope’s Alternate Form? (that the feat is based on)And inset fast movement as class feature and not a feat?Also, if all feats are replaced by the animal's feats, would that not mean that the feat allowing the character to change back would also be removed for the duration of the wild shape?[/sblock]</blockquote>