Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Modoc" data-source="post: 3759691" data-attributes="member: 40204">Bardsandsages,When I review college papers for other students and friends, I review for ease of reading, spelling mistakes, typos, and obvious omissions. I do not like to dig into the data or mechanics. That information and decision making process belongs solely to the author. What I am proposing is to review your material for the above stated issues and report back my findings for your (or any author’s) review. I will read the material from cover to cover, accurately document my findings, and include (at authors request) recommended changes for ease of reading. I will analyze stats blocks as well. Most mechanical aspects are relatively easy to determine. Again, when something is questionable I will make accurate notes and includes these in my findings.In regards to OGC and OGL content, since I am not an author I may be lacking in my understanding of the legalese, but I will be looking for obvious violations of the OGL. At the author’s request, I can submit a report of findings in any incremental way that is predetermined (i.e. by the chapter, every 15 pages, upon conclusion, etc). I hope that sheds a little more light on the subject and answers your question. I think the bottom line comes down too, like you mentioned, a second set of eyes. Reviewers will see things you don’t because we are not intimate with the material. Respectfully,Keith M. (Modoc)</blockquote>