Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Official Board Policy Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sacrosanct" data-source="post: 8984487" data-attributes="member: 15700"><p>I need some clarification on something that appears to be official board policy since it was made by a MOD in red text.</p><p></p><p>This is what Umbran quoted me:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And he responded with this:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Even ignoring the fact I wasn't telling anyone what they should do (only that we don't have moral high ground if we attack someone based on their (lack of) cognitive ability, which I didn't think was so controversial, but I guess it is), it reads to me that it's official board policy that attacking someone based on their cognitive function is OK because.....it's been going on for a while? And if we don't like seeing people attacked for their cognitive ability, we should just go elsewhere?</p><p></p><p>Ok, because if that's true, I will do just that. I do not want to be a part of a community where the community leaders support going after people based on their intelligence or lack thereof, regardless of what kind of person they happen to be.</p><p></p><p>So I'm asking for clarification on this. If it's true, please treat my account like lowkey's, and delete everything I've posted over the past 20 years here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sacrosanct, post: 8984487, member: 15700"] I need some clarification on something that appears to be official board policy since it was made by a MOD in red text. This is what Umbran quoted me: And he responded with this: Even ignoring the fact I wasn't telling anyone what they should do (only that we don't have moral high ground if we attack someone based on their (lack of) cognitive ability, which I didn't think was so controversial, but I guess it is), it reads to me that it's official board policy that attacking someone based on their cognitive function is OK because.....it's been going on for a while? And if we don't like seeing people attacked for their cognitive ability, we should just go elsewhere? Ok, because if that's true, I will do just that. I do not want to be a part of a community where the community leaders support going after people based on their intelligence or lack thereof, regardless of what kind of person they happen to be. So I'm asking for clarification on this. If it's true, please treat my account like lowkey's, and delete everything I've posted over the past 20 years here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Meta - Forums About Forums
Meta
Official Board Policy Question
Top