Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 7773906" data-attributes="member: 6795602">I know you think that.  What I don't understand is that I've presented proof that the disengage action cannot last till the end of your turn or till your movement ends and you still think that.  What about the proof doesn't convince you?When presented with a well reasoned and logical argument that shows at least 1 action can't last it's duration then any common or organic reading of the rules which result in that action lasting it's duration are also logically discarded.  At that point it stops being about intuition or what you feel is the best reading and what you've proven the best and most coherent interpretation cannot be.There's parts of this discussion that are definitely rulings.  However, when presented with proof that an interpretation has unintended and silly consequences (like disengage action does with the interpretation that it lasts until the end of your turn) then it's reasonable to abandon that interpretation.  So going back to the first question I asked, what is it about the proof I've offered about the disengage action that you don't find compelling?</blockquote>