Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Official material to help character motivation/party cohesion
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 8702962" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>The fact that you are doing your own charts and reasonings to bring the party together is much better and will ultimately prove more fruitful than anything WotC might've put in the DMG. So in the long run I think you're going to end up finding yourself better off than if you just relied on any generic WotC random table about why the PCs are together. Good work!</p><p></p><p>I mean it's like all the Bonds/Ideals/Flaws/Traits tables WotC makes for the Backgrounds. Sure, they are all fine for generic ideas... but none of them have any specificity towards what a person's PC is really going to know/have/experience in the campaign setting their DM is running. So none of those charts really end up being that useful, and you could say almost a waste of page and wordcount. A player making up their own BIFTs specific to the game they will be in will always be better.</p><p></p><p>Maybe it's just me... but every time someone wishes WotC would include something in the game so that they wouldn't have to do it themselves, I can't help but think that's really not true. Because making it up yourself will actually give you what you need, rather than some default idea by WotC that has to try to be everything for everyone, but ends up being nothing for no one.</p><p></p><p>I think you have made the right choice by creating your own. Here's hoping it works well for you!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 8702962, member: 7006"] The fact that you are doing your own charts and reasonings to bring the party together is much better and will ultimately prove more fruitful than anything WotC might've put in the DMG. So in the long run I think you're going to end up finding yourself better off than if you just relied on any generic WotC random table about why the PCs are together. Good work! I mean it's like all the Bonds/Ideals/Flaws/Traits tables WotC makes for the Backgrounds. Sure, they are all fine for generic ideas... but none of them have any specificity towards what a person's PC is really going to know/have/experience in the campaign setting their DM is running. So none of those charts really end up being that useful, and you could say almost a waste of page and wordcount. A player making up their own BIFTs specific to the game they will be in will always be better. Maybe it's just me... but every time someone wishes WotC would include something in the game so that they wouldn't have to do it themselves, I can't help but think that's really not true. Because making it up yourself will actually give you what you need, rather than some default idea by WotC that has to try to be everything for everyone, but ends up being nothing for no one. I think you have made the right choice by creating your own. Here's hoping it works well for you! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Official material to help character motivation/party cohesion
Top