Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5110703" data-attributes="member: 82106">Yeah, that was what I was going to say in a nutshell. Its diminishing returns. Sure you live FAR longer than you need to if something hits on a 19+ and 2x more than that if it hits on a 20. @DS: now now. You understood my argument and it was perfectly cogent. In any case my point was that there IS an advantage to having a high defense, its just that tactically its advantageous to know that you won't likely go down to a specific type of attack. Being 40% vulnerable to an attack on any NAD is worse in a lot of situations than being 60% vulnerable on two of them and only 10% vulnerable on the 3rd one, IF that 3rd one is the one that is being attacked NOW. A party with a diversity of different good and bad NADs is stronger than one with all evenly mediocre NADs across the whole spectrum of possible encounters.</blockquote>