Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
OGC equivalent to Thri-kreen? Green martians!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cleon" data-source="post: 6180590" data-attributes="member: 57383"><p>That pretty much is a Green Man with the serial numbers filed off. I'd just use that, possibly with some minor tweaking.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There's nothing about a torso stuck on a second torso in the description of the Quadruped trait, all it has is "Members of this race possess four legs and two arms", which basically is what a Green Martian has when it switches into walk-on-all-fours mode.</p><p></p><p>Secondly, there are a lot of illustrations of Green Martians that pretty much show them with a humanoid torso stuck on top of another humanoid torso - the Sean Reynold's conversion you quoted has one such by Michael Whelan from the cover of <em>Gods of Mars</em>. Presumably the Green Martian folds somewhere between these two "torsos" when running on all fours.</p><p></p><p>However the pertinent point is that the proposed "Semi-Quadruped" trait gives the Green Martian several advantages that the standard Quadruped trait doesn't, so it ought to have a higher RP value. Wielding large weapons instead of Medium ones is a significant advantage, and you've also added a CMD bonus to Bull Rush and cancelled their AC penalty (which should really still apply since they're still Large - a Centaur doesn't ignore that size penalty because its a quadruped).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If the longswords and longspears are Medium sized than the Green Martian will have a -2 penalty to attack for using an Inappropriately Sized Weapon:</p><p></p><p>Quoting Pathfinder's <strong><a href="http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/equipment.html" target="_blank">Equipment Rules</a></strong>:</p><p><em>Inappropriately Sized Weapons</em>: A creature can't make optimum use of a weapon that isn't properly sized for it. A cumulative –2 penalty applies on attack rolls for each size category of difference between the size of its intended wielder and the size of its actual wielder. If the creature isn't proficient with the weapon, a –4 nonproficiency penalty also applies.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Rather than Medium sized Longsword a Large multiarmed creature is better off using a Large sized Shortsword - same damage and threat range but no inappropriate size penalty.</p><p></p><p>Incidentally, according to the Equipment Rule-As-Written, a Longspear has a 10 ft. Reach but can't attack an adjacent opponent. If we applied that literally, a Green Martian would be better off with a standard Spear, since they can still attack out to 10 ft. (since they have Reach), but can also attack an adjacent square and throw the spear.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That doesn't change the problem that mechanically there seems no reason that only "particularly skilled" Green Martians use three or four weapons instead of two, since they have the same penalties whether they wield 2, 3, or 4 weapons at once. They get the same -6 penalty for ALL of their offhands because they have Multiweapon Fighting.</p><p></p><p>Hmm, one solution would be to give the basic Green Martian a bonus feat of Two-Weapon Fighting instead, then it would be able to wield two weapons proficiently, but only an skillful Green Martian (e.g. one that had gained the Multiweapon Fighting feat) would use three or four weapons in combat.</p><p></p><p>That ought to be legal since bonus feats don't need to follow a feat's normal Prereqs.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cleon, post: 6180590, member: 57383"] That pretty much is a Green Man with the serial numbers filed off. I'd just use that, possibly with some minor tweaking. There's nothing about a torso stuck on a second torso in the description of the Quadruped trait, all it has is "Members of this race possess four legs and two arms", which basically is what a Green Martian has when it switches into walk-on-all-fours mode. Secondly, there are a lot of illustrations of Green Martians that pretty much show them with a humanoid torso stuck on top of another humanoid torso - the Sean Reynold's conversion you quoted has one such by Michael Whelan from the cover of [I]Gods of Mars[/I]. Presumably the Green Martian folds somewhere between these two "torsos" when running on all fours. However the pertinent point is that the proposed "Semi-Quadruped" trait gives the Green Martian several advantages that the standard Quadruped trait doesn't, so it ought to have a higher RP value. Wielding large weapons instead of Medium ones is a significant advantage, and you've also added a CMD bonus to Bull Rush and cancelled their AC penalty (which should really still apply since they're still Large - a Centaur doesn't ignore that size penalty because its a quadruped). If the longswords and longspears are Medium sized than the Green Martian will have a -2 penalty to attack for using an Inappropriately Sized Weapon: Quoting Pathfinder's [B][URL="http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/equipment.html"]Equipment Rules[/URL][/B]: [I]Inappropriately Sized Weapons[/I]: A creature can't make optimum use of a weapon that isn't properly sized for it. A cumulative –2 penalty applies on attack rolls for each size category of difference between the size of its intended wielder and the size of its actual wielder. If the creature isn't proficient with the weapon, a –4 nonproficiency penalty also applies. Rather than Medium sized Longsword a Large multiarmed creature is better off using a Large sized Shortsword - same damage and threat range but no inappropriate size penalty. Incidentally, according to the Equipment Rule-As-Written, a Longspear has a 10 ft. Reach but can't attack an adjacent opponent. If we applied that literally, a Green Martian would be better off with a standard Spear, since they can still attack out to 10 ft. (since they have Reach), but can also attack an adjacent square and throw the spear. That doesn't change the problem that mechanically there seems no reason that only "particularly skilled" Green Martians use three or four weapons instead of two, since they have the same penalties whether they wield 2, 3, or 4 weapons at once. They get the same -6 penalty for ALL of their offhands because they have Multiweapon Fighting. Hmm, one solution would be to give the basic Green Martian a bonus feat of Two-Weapon Fighting instead, then it would be able to wield two weapons proficiently, but only an skillful Green Martian (e.g. one that had gained the Multiweapon Fighting feat) would use three or four weapons in combat. That ought to be legal since bonus feats don't need to follow a feat's normal Prereqs. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
OGC equivalent to Thri-kreen? Green martians!
Top