Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Zelgar" data-source="post: 2766172" data-attributes="member: 6630">How is having a WIKI with OGC material abuse?&nbsp; Provided that all of the OGL is followed, I would think that publishers would be more favorable to the WIKI than having other publishers possibly changing the intent of the OGC material originally published by the author.To me, the most fair method would to have all of the OGC material on the net with each page having a link back to the origin of the OGC.&nbsp; The language in the WIKI should be exactly the same as the original OGC with possible sublinks if there had been revisions by the original publisher or others.Mr Reed indicates that one of his concerns is &quot;how the material is used&quot;.&nbsp; From my understanding, the WIKI would be organized in a fairly standard manner (e.g., by class, prestigue class, race, feats, spells, etc.) and use the original OGC language.&nbsp; How would this be misuse of the material?Zelgar</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Zelgar, post: 2766172, member: 6630"] How is having a WIKI with OGC material abuse? Provided that all of the OGL is followed, I would think that publishers would be more favorable to the WIKI than having other publishers possibly changing the intent of the OGC material originally published by the author. To me, the most fair method would to have all of the OGC material on the net with each page having a link back to the origin of the OGC. The language in the WIKI should be exactly the same as the original OGC with possible sublinks if there had been revisions by the original publisher or others. Mr Reed indicates that one of his concerns is "how the material is used". From my understanding, the WIKI would be organized in a fairly standard manner (e.g., by class, prestigue class, race, feats, spells, etc.) and use the original OGC language. How would this be misuse of the material? Zelgar [/QUOTE]

Verification