Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
OGC Wiki?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jgbrowning" data-source="post: 2774495" data-attributes="member: 5724"><p>They are. Given the rest of your post, I don't think you are, however.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There is no "minimum" amount of required OGC in an OGL product. There is no "tax."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This isn't true.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Since there is no minimum required the above doesn't follow.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes. This is not the Open Source software community, however. What you describe is <strong>not common practice</strong> in this community. In fact, unlike Open Source software in which the end user benefits from the above practice, the end user will not benefit as less OGC material will be produced.</p><p></p><p>The people making OGC, unlike the people making Open Source software, are doing so because they're being fiscally rewarded.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No one has ever been "forced" to add OGC material. I could close every single thing I've ever done and use Phil's "Only game mechanics directly based on material from the SRD is presented as open game content. All text, including names and descriptions, are closed content and may not be used without permission of the publisher," as my statement.</p><p></p><p>If every publisher starts doing this, the only new OGC will be coming from non-publishers.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Much of your post and train of thought is based upon a misunderstanding of the license.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Indeed! It appears that all the publishers who don't want a FREE to the public source of OGC have been incredibly irresponsible by <strong>creating the damn OGC to begin with</strong> that other people now think is supposed to be free of cost because "the license means it can be free of cost."</p><p></p><p>Oh well. I have been irresponsible in assuming others could be responsible. I guess I should go be responsible by closing as much as possible in my upcoming works and let all the publishers know, "Hey just contact me and I'll let you use whatever you want. I would have made it all open but some people don't respect the fact that I want to get paid for my work."</p><p></p><p>I imagine this would be the result. A "Cabal" of publishers who allow other publishers to reuse material while prohibiting anything but the very minimum from being OGC.</p><p></p><p>Is getting stuff for free (of cost) really worth creating such a <strong>"community"</strong>?</p><p></p><p>joe b.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jgbrowning, post: 2774495, member: 5724"] They are. Given the rest of your post, I don't think you are, however. There is no "minimum" amount of required OGC in an OGL product. There is no "tax." This isn't true. Since there is no minimum required the above doesn't follow. Yes. This is not the Open Source software community, however. What you describe is [b]not common practice[/b] in this community. In fact, unlike Open Source software in which the end user benefits from the above practice, the end user will not benefit as less OGC material will be produced. The people making OGC, unlike the people making Open Source software, are doing so because they're being fiscally rewarded. No one has ever been "forced" to add OGC material. I could close every single thing I've ever done and use Phil's "Only game mechanics directly based on material from the SRD is presented as open game content. All text, including names and descriptions, are closed content and may not be used without permission of the publisher," as my statement. If every publisher starts doing this, the only new OGC will be coming from non-publishers. Much of your post and train of thought is based upon a misunderstanding of the license. Indeed! It appears that all the publishers who don't want a FREE to the public source of OGC have been incredibly irresponsible by [b]creating the damn OGC to begin with[/b] that other people now think is supposed to be free of cost because "the license means it can be free of cost." Oh well. I have been irresponsible in assuming others could be responsible. I guess I should go be responsible by closing as much as possible in my upcoming works and let all the publishers know, "Hey just contact me and I'll let you use whatever you want. I would have made it all open but some people don't respect the fact that I want to get paid for my work." I imagine this would be the result. A "Cabal" of publishers who allow other publishers to reuse material while prohibiting anything but the very minimum from being OGC. Is getting stuff for free (of cost) really worth creating such a [b]"community"[/b]? joe b. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
OGC Wiki?
Top