Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="R_kajdi" data-source="post: 2774695" data-attributes="member: 24709">#1. There is a minimum amount. That amount is everything derivative of other OGC you used, which may be a bit more than some of you seem to be letting on. Don't assume I made a mistake when I didn't. You are correct there is minimum by % for d20, but that's a seperate issue. I didn't mention d20 (At least I don't think I did) so I'm not sure where the confusion comes from.    #2. I'm really confused here. You easily have the ability to secure most of the stuff you want to, but choose not to. Why? If you didn't want someone to use something, you shouldn't have left it open. It's like taking stuff to a swap meet to give away, and then getting angry that people take it. You could have easily chosen to not put your stuff up there to be reused, so there's a big assumption that stuff you put there is stuff you meant to.     #3. I really don't understand the logic of asking people not to something within the bounds of a license. I know from the software business, if a company asked someone not to do something that they a) wanted to do, and b) had a license to do, you'd just get laughed out of the room, or told that a renegotiation of the contract was needed. Since this problem is pretty obvious to someone looking at the situation from the outside, I don't see why it wasn't apparent from the inside.    I'm not actually interested in either using or building such a wiki, (I use WotC stuff for the vast majority of what I game with) but this conversation interested me because of how loosely people expected the rules of the situation to be applied. You took from the common pot, and are now asking others not to do the same. That just seems a bit irresponsible (esp. considering the small amount of extra effort required to hold off the issue in the first place) and hypocritical (You are asking other people to not mine the resources you opened up the way you did to the ones that were available to you) This is more of a thought agrument to me.     Raymond K. Crum</blockquote>

Verification