Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 8896848" data-attributes="member: 59057">I am concerned. But if the OGL 2.0 is reasonable, I think a few companies that under OGL 1.1 will not turn their back.Right now it is a muscle play between WotC and the 3PP.I think, if they start a war, everyone could lose. So maybe both sides show goodwill and find an agreement and then everyone is concerned about getting the community back on board.4e had other problems than the GSL: a rushed out and unpolished system that changed the core of D&amp;D. A great game, but not what about half the people wanted of D&amp;D. It split the community in half. The GSL for some was a factor, for most it was not.The only factor was that it was an incentive for 3PP to produce what many people considered true d&amp;d. Now, if the 3pp don't support the current edition, the sides are flipped. Now wotc has d&amp;d as it used to be and the 3pp needs to come up with an alternate system.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="UngeheuerLich, post: 8896848, member: 59057"] I am concerned. But if the OGL 2.0 is reasonable, I think a few companies that under OGL 1.1 will not turn their back. Right now it is a muscle play between WotC and the 3PP. I think, if they start a war, everyone could lose. So maybe both sides show goodwill and find an agreement and then everyone is concerned about getting the community back on board. 4e had other problems than the GSL: a rushed out and unpolished system that changed the core of D&D. A great game, but not what about half the people wanted of D&D. It split the community in half. The GSL for some was a factor, for most it was not. The only factor was that it was an incentive for 3PP to produce what many people considered true d&d. Now, if the 3pp don't support the current edition, the sides are flipped. Now wotc has d&d as it used to be and the 3pp needs to come up with an alternate system. [/QUOTE]

Verification