Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Umbran" data-source="post: 8888541" data-attributes="member: 177">A large part of the context that would be informative is knowing the inside of your head.  Your best friends might be able to guess what you mean, but casual acquaintances on the internet can't do so reliably.Yeah, but that's also the only "need" that we necessarily share.  You and I, and others here may want various different things out of the industry and community.Yes, and, that failure may produce needs.The way the licensing as we have seen it goes, if it isn't under their control, it is vestigial support.  So, then if something 5e like is to continue in a vibrant form, it would "need" a new, open content foundation.If you don't give a fig about variety of ongoing support for 5e, then no, you don't need this.  If you do care, you probably do need this.  The basic method is the one that has always existed, but is a real pain in the butt - strip the game down to its essential mechanics, and rewrite those in new words.</blockquote>