Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
OGL: Kobold Press 'Raising Our Flag' For New Open RPG
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steel_Wind" data-source="post: 8888867" data-attributes="member: 20741"><p>Respectfully, this is not the way it works in our legal system.</p><p></p><p>It isn't the third party who have to put their "claims" to the test. A 3pp just goes and does what it wants to do, relying on the OGL 1.0a. It is incumbent on WotC to take the other guy to court and try to obtain an injunction. The little guy doesn't have to prove <em>jack.</em></p><p></p><p>Because of: the nature of the OGL 1.0a; WotC's own claims about 1.0a on its own website; evidence from its past corporate officers; and, the evidence of what WotC did and didn't do with PF1 (and what happened thereafter); WotC is <em>quite unlikely</em> to be able to win an injunction motion. It simply can't meet this three-part legal test:</p><p></p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It can't prove it has a strong <em>prima facie</em> case (though it might prove there is a serious question to be tried);</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">It can't prove <em>irreparable harm</em> (the fallout from Pathfinder 1 demonstrates that); and,</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">the balance of convenience is <em>clearly</em> against granting the injunction. The whole industry has operated under the validity of the OGL 1.0a <strong><em>for 23 years.</em></strong></li> </ul><p>WotC must prove every one of those parts of the test. Fail even one of them? They lose the injunction motion.</p><p>WotC is not winning any injunction, imo.</p><p></p><p>So then WotC is in it for the long haul; it's a long lawsuit and appeals where the systemic delays in the legal system all accrue to the benefit of the defendant - and the prejudice of WotC. WotC won't get its way. We'll be half way to 7th edition before that first lawsuit is ever resolved. And to be clear, I expect WotC will <em>probably</em> lose.</p><p></p><p>The only thing WotC is "banking on" is that, come what may, the D&D brand will survive any setback in the short to medium term - including WotC's mismanagement - to ultimately prevail. D&D is "top of mind" in RPGs and everybody has heard of it. That's what WotC has going for them. Everything else is secondary to that.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steel_Wind, post: 8888867, member: 20741"] Respectfully, this is not the way it works in our legal system. It isn't the third party who have to put their "claims" to the test. A 3pp just goes and does what it wants to do, relying on the OGL 1.0a. It is incumbent on WotC to take the other guy to court and try to obtain an injunction. The little guy doesn't have to prove [I]jack.[/I] Because of: the nature of the OGL 1.0a; WotC's own claims about 1.0a on its own website; evidence from its past corporate officers; and, the evidence of what WotC did and didn't do with PF1 (and what happened thereafter); WotC is [I]quite unlikely[/I] to be able to win an injunction motion. It simply can't meet this three-part legal test: [LIST] [*]It can't prove it has a strong [I]prima facie[/I] case (though it might prove there is a serious question to be tried); [*]It can't prove [I]irreparable harm[/I] (the fallout from Pathfinder 1 demonstrates that); and, [*]the balance of convenience is [I]clearly[/I] against granting the injunction. The whole industry has operated under the validity of the OGL 1.0a [B][I]for 23 years.[/I][/B] [/LIST] WotC must prove every one of those parts of the test. Fail even one of them? They lose the injunction motion. WotC is not winning any injunction, imo. So then WotC is in it for the long haul; it's a long lawsuit and appeals where the systemic delays in the legal system all accrue to the benefit of the defendant - and the prejudice of WotC. WotC won't get its way. We'll be half way to 7th edition before that first lawsuit is ever resolved. And to be clear, I expect WotC will [I]probably[/I] lose. The only thing WotC is "banking on" is that, come what may, the D&D brand will survive any setback in the short to medium term - including WotC's mismanagement - to ultimately prevail. D&D is "top of mind" in RPGs and everybody has heard of it. That's what WotC has going for them. Everything else is secondary to that. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
OGL: Kobold Press 'Raising Our Flag' For New Open RPG
Top