Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ogres As Characters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Larcen" data-source="post: 1320023" data-attributes="member: 2406"><p>?! Whoa. Where did this come from ? What hate? I'm sorry if I came across as hateful, but that was definately not my intention. I even threw a couple of smileys in there and everything. Ask anyone who knows me, I am pretty happy-go-lucky guy. I thought we were having a friendly conversation here, not getting ugly.</p><p></p><p>As you say, I may have missed the gist of your point. But I also feel I didn't make mine clear enough. All I was doing was trying to defend half-orcs, since I am thinking of playing one and have seen others play them successfully. </p><p></p><p>I was guessing (correct me if am wrong) that the main complaint people have about half-orcs is the extra stat penalty they get and I was trying to explain in my last post why that, in itself, should not make or break them as viable PCs. </p><p></p><p>And the best example I could think of for that is to state that people have been playing party members for years that didn't have stats that all added up to the same number of bonuses. Sometimes they were vastly different, more so than a given character having an extra -2. </p><p></p><p>To some people that kind of game balance is just not THAT important. Anymore important then 4d6 will naturally make some PCs more powerful than others. If balanced stats were honest and truly all that important, random generation methods would not exist. Like they do now for a lot of players and like they did back in 1E for all players. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> </p><p></p><p>Let me give you another example that I hope doesn't confuse the issue even more. Sorcerers by a lot of people's reckoning are weaker than wizards. But I still would rather play a sorcerer. Why? Because, despite any perceived game mechanic flaw, I think they are WAY COOLER than wizards. I would rather play a charismatic character that travels light (no spellbooks) than a stuffy bookworm tied to his musty tomes. </p><p></p><p>Well, the same can be said for half-orcs. Some people play them because, despite all, they feel they are just plain cool. Maybe they like playing big, smelly, obnoxious, one dimensional half-breeds. Those people do not look at the race rules and say, "whoa, they get an extra stat penalty? forget it!" They just don't care. They are taking the race for other reasons. Hopefully sometimes roleplaying reasons. </p><p></p><p>Take the half-orc in our party for example. He is the most fleshed out character we have, IMO. And he certainly doesn't fit the half-orc mold of a brainless warrior. In fact, he is trying very hard to civiliize and sophisticate himself and fit into human society. It's a very cool character with lots of angst and depth. Would have been a shame if the player had discounted him on account of the extra -2 to his INT. (INT was the stat that he really hated losing out on, due to the character concept.)</p><p></p><p>Maybe you will get offended again. Maybe it will be because I am stating the obvious here. Maybe because I am still missing your point. But, when you make statements like this I feel I must defend the hapless half-orcs:</p><p></p><p>"Halforcs are a boring race, they have no real bonuses save one, and have a more than one penalty. It doesnt balance out. It, in general, isnt fun to play as compared to a race that has interesting things behind it."</p><p></p><p>I am just not seeing how half-orcs are so boring and uninteresting as compared to the others races. Because they are sub-optimal game mechanically?? Call me dense, but I just don't see it.</p><p></p><p>Sorry if I am coming across wrong again. Just in case, here are some extra smileys for you:</p><p></p><p> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f60e.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":cool:" title="Cool :cool:" data-smilie="6"data-shortname=":cool:" /> <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f600.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":D" title="Big grin :D" data-smilie="8"data-shortname=":D" /> </p><p></p><p></p><p>(Please don't take any of that as highhanded and sarcastic. I am truly trying to avoid confrontation here. Just having good conversation. Ok?)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Larcen, post: 1320023, member: 2406"] ?! Whoa. Where did this come from ? What hate? I'm sorry if I came across as hateful, but that was definately not my intention. I even threw a couple of smileys in there and everything. Ask anyone who knows me, I am pretty happy-go-lucky guy. I thought we were having a friendly conversation here, not getting ugly. As you say, I may have missed the gist of your point. But I also feel I didn't make mine clear enough. All I was doing was trying to defend half-orcs, since I am thinking of playing one and have seen others play them successfully. I was guessing (correct me if am wrong) that the main complaint people have about half-orcs is the extra stat penalty they get and I was trying to explain in my last post why that, in itself, should not make or break them as viable PCs. And the best example I could think of for that is to state that people have been playing party members for years that didn't have stats that all added up to the same number of bonuses. Sometimes they were vastly different, more so than a given character having an extra -2. To some people that kind of game balance is just not THAT important. Anymore important then 4d6 will naturally make some PCs more powerful than others. If balanced stats were honest and truly all that important, random generation methods would not exist. Like they do now for a lot of players and like they did back in 1E for all players. :) Let me give you another example that I hope doesn't confuse the issue even more. Sorcerers by a lot of people's reckoning are weaker than wizards. But I still would rather play a sorcerer. Why? Because, despite any perceived game mechanic flaw, I think they are WAY COOLER than wizards. I would rather play a charismatic character that travels light (no spellbooks) than a stuffy bookworm tied to his musty tomes. Well, the same can be said for half-orcs. Some people play them because, despite all, they feel they are just plain cool. Maybe they like playing big, smelly, obnoxious, one dimensional half-breeds. Those people do not look at the race rules and say, "whoa, they get an extra stat penalty? forget it!" They just don't care. They are taking the race for other reasons. Hopefully sometimes roleplaying reasons. Take the half-orc in our party for example. He is the most fleshed out character we have, IMO. And he certainly doesn't fit the half-orc mold of a brainless warrior. In fact, he is trying very hard to civiliize and sophisticate himself and fit into human society. It's a very cool character with lots of angst and depth. Would have been a shame if the player had discounted him on account of the extra -2 to his INT. (INT was the stat that he really hated losing out on, due to the character concept.) Maybe you will get offended again. Maybe it will be because I am stating the obvious here. Maybe because I am still missing your point. But, when you make statements like this I feel I must defend the hapless half-orcs: "Halforcs are a boring race, they have no real bonuses save one, and have a more than one penalty. It doesnt balance out. It, in general, isnt fun to play as compared to a race that has interesting things behind it." I am just not seeing how half-orcs are so boring and uninteresting as compared to the others races. Because they are sub-optimal game mechanically?? Call me dense, but I just don't see it. Sorry if I am coming across wrong again. Just in case, here are some extra smileys for you: :cool: :D :cool: :D :cool: :D :cool: :D (Please don't take any of that as highhanded and sarcastic. I am truly trying to avoid confrontation here. Just having good conversation. Ok?) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Ogres As Characters
Top