Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="malladin" data-source="post: 3793740" data-attributes="member: 8230"><p>It would be nice if people where only saying you've not got enough information to make that statement against 4th ed only in cases where the postrs are rampant speculation. Unfortunately this is often not the case. A lot of people also fail to grasp that just because the information being released claims something doesn't mean its not open to interpretation on how whats stated will actually achieve the stated goal. Like the OP I see a lot of posts that outright dismiss negartive views on 4th ed as lacking sufficient basis and a lot less that do it on posirtive opinions but little difference in many cases of the basis for the opinion in whats stated by Wizards or logic to how its interpreted. And regardless of my own opinions its sad and annoying to see a double standard accepted and frequently applied.</p></blockquote><p></p>