Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
OK to make PC build dependent on magic item for viability?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheSword" data-source="post: 8485442" data-attributes="member: 6879661"><p>This kind of question brings me back to Pathfinder days when it was assumed that magic items were available for sale at fixed prices and pretty much as determined in the rules.</p><p></p><p>Is it ok? Well that depends entirely on the people you play with. In my group, one player would probably have no problem with with it and would want to do it. Two people would be very wary might agree if a case was made. Two would be pretty much against it… I would be one of those. That said your DM is letting you have an uncommon item. I don’t think it’s your fault if youre</p><p></p><p>Essentially MAD is method of controlling power, particularly with multi-classing. The most broken combinations for me seem to be multi-classing that isn’t MAD. The solution isn’t to reduce how MAD other combinations are but to prevent Sorcadins for working as they do currently.</p><p></p><p>My fundamental question would be, why can’t this work with Str, Int Con 16 and 8/9’s in other stats? Or 14’s and 10’s and 12’s in other stats (assuming a 27 point buy). If you need essentially + 15 extra points buy to make this character work how is it going to compare to everyone else round the table.</p><p></p><p>The stat bonuses required are balanced against the difficulty of the challenges the DM is throwing at you. If you need +4 stat to get a spell off or to hit something is the game difficulty set really high? </p><p></p><p>I just can’t get over the fact that the incredibly good gauntlets of ogre power are only uncommon. Magic item rarities are boinked.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheSword, post: 8485442, member: 6879661"] This kind of question brings me back to Pathfinder days when it was assumed that magic items were available for sale at fixed prices and pretty much as determined in the rules. Is it ok? Well that depends entirely on the people you play with. In my group, one player would probably have no problem with with it and would want to do it. Two people would be very wary might agree if a case was made. Two would be pretty much against it… I would be one of those. That said your DM is letting you have an uncommon item. I don’t think it’s your fault if youre Essentially MAD is method of controlling power, particularly with multi-classing. The most broken combinations for me seem to be multi-classing that isn’t MAD. The solution isn’t to reduce how MAD other combinations are but to prevent Sorcadins for working as they do currently. My fundamental question would be, why can’t this work with Str, Int Con 16 and 8/9’s in other stats? Or 14’s and 10’s and 12’s in other stats (assuming a 27 point buy). If you need essentially + 15 extra points buy to make this character work how is it going to compare to everyone else round the table. The stat bonuses required are balanced against the difficulty of the challenges the DM is throwing at you. If you need +4 stat to get a spell off or to hit something is the game difficulty set really high? I just can’t get over the fact that the incredibly good gauntlets of ogre power are only uncommon. Magic item rarities are boinked. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
OK to make PC build dependent on magic item for viability?
Top