Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Okay people, a little wake up call.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Byronic" data-source="post: 4258565" data-attributes="member: 56829"><p>It seems I phrased it wrong, ok let me try again then. Instead of Rogue let me say, renaissance man. I want the third son of a Baron who's quite learned in different things (Rogue gives enough skill points for this) and fights with a light blade style. Rogue in third edition fits this perfectly and it's not an uncommon concept. Yet while you can get the fighting style right in 4.0 (perhaps even better) the mental part of doesn't quite fit. Sure you can simply say that it's part of his background. But that doesn't mean it's supported by the system. And yes you can house rule it, but that's not part of the system either.</p><p></p><p>And that's what a lot of people are saying really. Not that they can't change it, but that it's a pity that it's like that in the first place.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>About skills, I already made a house rule about that. </p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=228227" target="_blank">http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=228227</a></p><p></p><p>I don't know if I'll use it. But I like the idea that I *can* use it</p><p></p><p>As for the second part, I'm not saying that they have BadWrongFun. I'm saying that some simply don't have as much fun. I'm sure that there are lots of people who find min-maxing lovely and have lots of fun doing it like that. But I wasn't talking about them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Well this is the cruz of the matter. It's not really that 4.0 is right or wrong. It's simply a system for people to play in. It just depends what kind of game you want. The rogue character I mentioned earlier is a good example. </p><p></p><p>Some people consider it the most fun if the game from one battle to another. Perhaps loosely connected with a story and a goal or two. 4.0 is perfect for these people. It's build for tactics, balanced fighting etc. If they made the renaissance character I mentioned earlier they would love the 4.0 version.</p><p></p><p>Another extreme might be people who want to deal with other aspects of the world. Let's say the renaissance character managed to win a keep and wanted to deal with the administration, hold a ball and talk to some people about art and woo the girls there so he could marry her and add more land to his own (a more political social based game) then 3.x seems a lot better then 4.0. </p><p></p><p>Mind you, they are somewhat extremes but I did that for simplification.</p><p></p><p>Me, I plan on finishing this popcorn and later on look forward to tactics in 4.0. And making more social etc games with other systems.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Byronic, post: 4258565, member: 56829"] It seems I phrased it wrong, ok let me try again then. Instead of Rogue let me say, renaissance man. I want the third son of a Baron who's quite learned in different things (Rogue gives enough skill points for this) and fights with a light blade style. Rogue in third edition fits this perfectly and it's not an uncommon concept. Yet while you can get the fighting style right in 4.0 (perhaps even better) the mental part of doesn't quite fit. Sure you can simply say that it's part of his background. But that doesn't mean it's supported by the system. And yes you can house rule it, but that's not part of the system either. And that's what a lot of people are saying really. Not that they can't change it, but that it's a pity that it's like that in the first place. About skills, I already made a house rule about that. [url]http://www.enworld.org/showthread.php?t=228227[/url] I don't know if I'll use it. But I like the idea that I *can* use it As for the second part, I'm not saying that they have BadWrongFun. I'm saying that some simply don't have as much fun. I'm sure that there are lots of people who find min-maxing lovely and have lots of fun doing it like that. But I wasn't talking about them. Well this is the cruz of the matter. It's not really that 4.0 is right or wrong. It's simply a system for people to play in. It just depends what kind of game you want. The rogue character I mentioned earlier is a good example. Some people consider it the most fun if the game from one battle to another. Perhaps loosely connected with a story and a goal or two. 4.0 is perfect for these people. It's build for tactics, balanced fighting etc. If they made the renaissance character I mentioned earlier they would love the 4.0 version. Another extreme might be people who want to deal with other aspects of the world. Let's say the renaissance character managed to win a keep and wanted to deal with the administration, hold a ball and talk to some people about art and woo the girls there so he could marry her and add more land to his own (a more political social based game) then 3.x seems a lot better then 4.0. Mind you, they are somewhat extremes but I did that for simplification. Me, I plan on finishing this popcorn and later on look forward to tactics in 4.0. And making more social etc games with other systems. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Okay people, a little wake up call.
Top