Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Voadam" data-source="post: 9119412" data-attributes="member: 2209">I pulled up 64 on my CD files and there it is.That is certainly an interesting interpretation of the PH rules, that the SA interpretation of principal applies to everything except the two classes used as examples, including the only one that explicitly lists its principal attribute, and obviously don't use xp bonus attributes because while that would work with the given example you would have to make exceptions for two classes. The logic is almost like saying use the non proficiency penalties when you use a weapon not permitted by your class. The difference being that SA said not to use the non proficiency penalties. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I don't see an author listed, is that Gygax?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Voadam, post: 9119412, member: 2209"] I pulled up 64 on my CD files and there it is. That is certainly an interesting interpretation of the PH rules, that the SA interpretation of principal applies to everything except the two classes used as examples, including the only one that explicitly lists its principal attribute, and obviously don't use xp bonus attributes because while that would work with the given example you would have to make exceptions for two classes. The logic is almost like saying use the non proficiency penalties when you use a weapon not permitted by your class. The difference being that SA said not to use the non proficiency penalties. :) I don't see an author listed, is that Gygax? [/QUOTE]

Verification