Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 9119534" data-attributes="member: 29398">I'm not denying the wierdness on this one! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />And it was dual-class (one advances then stops completely until the other catches up, the way Himans had to do it), not multi-class (both classes advance independently, side-along, the way Elves could do it).  It's a semantic difference, but relevant.Not quite sure how you're parsing five principal attributes from five attributes with minima; as all classes had at least five attributes with minima and multi-classing (or dual-classing) into any of them wasn't as big a deal as this.I wonder if you're getting principal attributes mixed up with prime requisites (Str for Fighters, Int for Mages, etc.) off which the 10% experience bonus was derived.  The prime requisite for Paladins is Charisma, which still applies even though they never get access to that bonus.</blockquote>