Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Older Editions and "Balance" when compared to 3.5
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 5324956" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>Yep. It was apparently "overly pedantic" to point out that sleep didn't autowin every encounter, or every encounter a 1st level m-u was likely to encounter, when those were proposed. And, still, as you say, the contested point was "factually incorrect".</p><p></p><p>And it is not simply that "an encounter with creatures subject to sleep could have more creatures in the encounter than a sleep spell will overcome" -- all it requries is that they are not bunched in a group. </p><p></p><p>For example, I generously listed the giant frogs as an autowin, because it is conceivable that a DM might have them all bunched up in a group.....although that seems unlikely to me. Likewise, the rats are not necessarily bunched up, nor any of the humanoid encounters.</p><p></p><p>I also ignored the bit in the DMG about sleep spells, because it isn't necessarily clear how the DM will adjudicate that, which also affects the frog encounter (turning it from an autowin to a likely win).</p><p></p><p>So, again, I was giving the module the <em><strong>most generous reading possible</strong></em> for Hussar to be correct. And he was still "factually incorrect". </p><p></p><p>(Is there some other kind of incorrect, btw? Does this mean anything other than "wrong"?)</p><p></p><p>It is clearly and obviously true that, in 1e at least, our poor magic-user better not travel alone. Even with a <em><strong>Ring of Automatic Sleep At the Start of Each Encounter</strong></em>, he fails to trump the other classes.</p><p></p><p>The sleep spell is useful to the party, but the magic-user needs the party if he wishes to survive. And sleep is not an autowin for what he is likely to encounter, even if he can somehow take those encounters one at a time, regain the sleep spell between each encounter, always win initiative, and never get surprised.</p><p></p><p>Anyone who thinks differently will have a short-lived magic-user in 1e.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>So, what you're saying is that situations in which sleep is not autowin are in the majority?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/laugh.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":lol:" title="Laughing :lol:" data-shortname=":lol:" /></p><p></p><p>It was a silly idea long before we got to the Moathouse.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 5324956, member: 18280"] Yep. It was apparently "overly pedantic" to point out that sleep didn't autowin every encounter, or every encounter a 1st level m-u was likely to encounter, when those were proposed. And, still, as you say, the contested point was "factually incorrect". And it is not simply that "an encounter with creatures subject to sleep could have more creatures in the encounter than a sleep spell will overcome" -- all it requries is that they are not bunched in a group. For example, I generously listed the giant frogs as an autowin, because it is conceivable that a DM might have them all bunched up in a group.....although that seems unlikely to me. Likewise, the rats are not necessarily bunched up, nor any of the humanoid encounters. I also ignored the bit in the DMG about sleep spells, because it isn't necessarily clear how the DM will adjudicate that, which also affects the frog encounter (turning it from an autowin to a likely win). So, again, I was giving the module the [I][B]most generous reading possible[/B][/I] for Hussar to be correct. And he was still "factually incorrect". (Is there some other kind of incorrect, btw? Does this mean anything other than "wrong"?) It is clearly and obviously true that, in 1e at least, our poor magic-user better not travel alone. Even with a [I][B]Ring of Automatic Sleep At the Start of Each Encounter[/B][/I], he fails to trump the other classes. The sleep spell is useful to the party, but the magic-user needs the party if he wishes to survive. And sleep is not an autowin for what he is likely to encounter, even if he can somehow take those encounters one at a time, regain the sleep spell between each encounter, always win initiative, and never get surprised. Anyone who thinks differently will have a short-lived magic-user in 1e. So, what you're saying is that situations in which sleep is not autowin are in the majority? :lol: It was a silly idea long before we got to the Moathouse. RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Older Editions and "Balance" when compared to 3.5
Top