Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Older material in Pathfinder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steel_Wind" data-source="post: 5255214" data-attributes="member: 20741"><p>I think there are two schools of thought on this – and as they are radically different approaches to <em>Pathfinder</em>, it is not surprising that you will get radically different answers:</p><p></p><p> <u><strong>School #1:</strong></u> <span style="color: Orange"><strong><em>D&D 3.5 Was Broken by Way Too Many Splat Books</em></strong></span>: This group of 3.5 adherents may have been once enchanted by 3.5, but as the game wore on and WotC printed more and more accessory books on a monthly basis, members of this school became less and less happy with 3.5. They see <em>Pathfinder </em>as a way to jump to the next iteration of the game while avoiding the power creep inherent in the 3.5 splat era.</p><p></p><p> Members of this School tend to be against importing the same material into <em>Pathfinder</em> that they are trying to escape from in the first place. </p><p></p><p> <u><strong>School #2: </strong></u><span style="color: Orange"><strong><em>I have $3,500.00 Worth of 3.5 material and I Still Want to Use It:</em></strong></span> Members of this School tend to have shelves and shelves full of 3.xx material and unlike the members of School #1, they still want to use some of it when playing <em>Pathfinder</em>. As they want to justify still using this material, they tend to be more upbeat and supportive of attempts to use 3.xx material with <em>Pathfinder</em>.</p><p> <strong></strong></p><p><strong>Disclosure: </strong>I’m a member of School #1.</p><p></p><p> <u><strong>My Take:</strong></u> While I’d like to leave as much of 3.5 splat behind in the rear-view mirror, the fact is, there isn’t much to converting material from 3.5 to <em>Pathfinder</em>. Most of it, frankly, you can use straight out of the book without any modification whatsoever. </p><p></p><p> If you want to use <em>BoVD</em>? Do it. You can use it straight up. If you want to convert some of the PrCs – you can, but using them straight out of the book is not going to break anything if they are essentially for NPC purposes.</p><p></p><p> Whether you should do such a thing is a different question. But my answer to “should” is going to be very different than somebody else’s – let alone yours.</p><p></p><p> You “should” do whatever it is at your game table that you and your players enjoy. If that’s using 3.5 material in<em> Pathfinder</em> – more power to you. <em>Pathfinde</em>r was created to facilitate that capability with minimal fuss.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steel_Wind, post: 5255214, member: 20741"] I think there are two schools of thought on this – and as they are radically different approaches to [I]Pathfinder[/I], it is not surprising that you will get radically different answers: [U][B]School #1:[/B][/U] [COLOR=Orange][B][I]D&D 3.5 Was Broken by Way Too Many Splat Books[/I][/B][/COLOR]: This group of 3.5 adherents may have been once enchanted by 3.5, but as the game wore on and WotC printed more and more accessory books on a monthly basis, members of this school became less and less happy with 3.5. They see [I]Pathfinder [/I]as a way to jump to the next iteration of the game while avoiding the power creep inherent in the 3.5 splat era. Members of this School tend to be against importing the same material into [I]Pathfinder[/I] that they are trying to escape from in the first place. [U][B]School #2: [/B][/U][COLOR=Orange][B][I]I have $3,500.00 Worth of 3.5 material and I Still Want to Use It:[/I][/B][/COLOR] Members of this School tend to have shelves and shelves full of 3.xx material and unlike the members of School #1, they still want to use some of it when playing [I]Pathfinder[/I]. As they want to justify still using this material, they tend to be more upbeat and supportive of attempts to use 3.xx material with [I]Pathfinder[/I]. [B] Disclosure: [/B]I’m a member of School #1. [U][B]My Take:[/B][/U] While I’d like to leave as much of 3.5 splat behind in the rear-view mirror, the fact is, there isn’t much to converting material from 3.5 to [I]Pathfinder[/I]. Most of it, frankly, you can use straight out of the book without any modification whatsoever. If you want to use [I]BoVD[/I]? Do it. You can use it straight up. If you want to convert some of the PrCs – you can, but using them straight out of the book is not going to break anything if they are essentially for NPC purposes. Whether you should do such a thing is a different question. But my answer to “should” is going to be very different than somebody else’s – let alone yours. You “should” do whatever it is at your game table that you and your players enjoy. If that’s using 3.5 material in[I] Pathfinder[/I] – more power to you. [I]Pathfinde[/I]r was created to facilitate that capability with minimal fuss. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Older material in Pathfinder
Top