Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On gatekeeping and the 'live-streaming edition wars'
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MNblockhead" data-source="post: 7896134" data-attributes="member: 6796661"><p>How is it rude for consumers to express their desires for products to the companies producing them? </p><p></p><p>It it just good business sense if those companies produce products that large numbers of people want. There have always been consumers of TTRPG material, whether active players or not, who buy material more to enjoy reading than to put into use at the table. I really enjoyed Ravnica and both of the two recent Eberron books, though I doubt I'll ever run a campaign there. I already have enough material to run games for many years. But I still enjoy reading setting books.</p><p></p><p>Also, since I don't really have the time to keep up on Critical Role, I'm excited for the cartoon and it about having the setting book to add to the enjoyment of the world the CR team created. As a DM running a game set in the Lost Lands (Frog God Games), I can still get inspiration from other setting books. Even if I stopped running or playing in games, I can still enjoy reading the setting books. </p><p></p><p>The great thing about good setting books is that they can be enjoyed as lonely fun but also used to run games in. </p><p></p><p>I can't comprehend how this is taking anything away from anyone. </p><p></p><p>Even if the CR book is responsible for pushing away the release of other setting books (which CR and WotC claim it is not), as an old grognard, I just don't care. I've got the original Greyhawk on PDF and can still run games in that setting. Fans of older settings can still get materials for those older settings. Fans of new settings that have not been published can't. Supporting brand new settings tied to wildly popular shows and other games only makes sense. </p><p></p><p>If I want setting material that was popular in prior editions, I really don't need for it to be released in 5e. I can still get those materials pretty easily on DMs Guild.</p><p></p><p>If they revamp older settings for 5e and print them in high-quality hardcovers, that's cool, but they are going to make those decisions on how many copies they can expect to sell. I can't see how a Dark Sun, for a popularly cited example, can hope to compete with a CR or MTG source book, given the relative sized of their fan bases.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MNblockhead, post: 7896134, member: 6796661"] How is it rude for consumers to express their desires for products to the companies producing them? It it just good business sense if those companies produce products that large numbers of people want. There have always been consumers of TTRPG material, whether active players or not, who buy material more to enjoy reading than to put into use at the table. I really enjoyed Ravnica and both of the two recent Eberron books, though I doubt I'll ever run a campaign there. I already have enough material to run games for many years. But I still enjoy reading setting books. Also, since I don't really have the time to keep up on Critical Role, I'm excited for the cartoon and it about having the setting book to add to the enjoyment of the world the CR team created. As a DM running a game set in the Lost Lands (Frog God Games), I can still get inspiration from other setting books. Even if I stopped running or playing in games, I can still enjoy reading the setting books. The great thing about good setting books is that they can be enjoyed as lonely fun but also used to run games in. I can't comprehend how this is taking anything away from anyone. Even if the CR book is responsible for pushing away the release of other setting books (which CR and WotC claim it is not), as an old grognard, I just don't care. I've got the original Greyhawk on PDF and can still run games in that setting. Fans of older settings can still get materials for those older settings. Fans of new settings that have not been published can't. Supporting brand new settings tied to wildly popular shows and other games only makes sense. If I want setting material that was popular in prior editions, I really don't need for it to be released in 5e. I can still get those materials pretty easily on DMs Guild. If they revamp older settings for 5e and print them in high-quality hardcovers, that's cool, but they are going to make those decisions on how many copies they can expect to sell. I can't see how a Dark Sun, for a popularly cited example, can hope to compete with a CR or MTG source book, given the relative sized of their fan bases. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
On gatekeeping and the 'live-streaming edition wars'
Top