Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="transmission89" data-source="post: 8247839" data-attributes="member: 6688441">Insert away. There's no argument from my part. Just bafflement!I understand what you're saying about 3.x, but from my point of view about it, I respectfully disagree. Of course, this is entirely subjective. I'm more than happy to play it, but will never DM a 3.x based system again. It may have had those spaces you described, but to be honest, I never felt like it. I felt suffocated by those rules, being afraid to make rulings on the fly in case they contradicted some RAW buried away somewhere.Those feats were a pain point, and again, from my subjective point of view, I do feel they inhibited my players rather than empower. They were also an absolute PITA for me as a DM. I spent so long trying to focus on the feat aspect of the monsters, and the mechanics, It took an age to create encounters and worry about if I was running them right or they were balanced. This is why I feel older games are more liberating. Monsters I can whip up on index cards, not have to worry about mechanics and just enjoy the fiction of it. OFC, YMMV</blockquote>